Efficiency of purchasing and selling agents in markets with quality uncertainty: The case of illicit drug transactions

Since Akerlof’s theory of lemons, economists have viewed quality uncertainty as an informational advantage for sellers. Drawing on frontier techniques, we propose in this paper a simple method for measuring inefficiency of both sellers and buyers in markets for goods with different levels of quality. We apply a non-parametric robust double-frontier framework to the case of illicit substance markets, which suffer from imperfect information about drug quality for purchasers and to a lesser extent for sellers. We use unique data on cannabis and cocaine transactions collected in France that include information about price, quantity exchanged and purity. We find that transactional inefficiency does not really benefit either dealers or purchasers. Furthermore, information influences the performance of agents during market transactions.

[1]  Patrick Paul Walsh,et al.  Modelling Price Dispersion as an Outcome of Competition in the Irish Grocery Market , 2003 .

[2]  Rema Padman,et al.  Quantity Discounts and Quality Premia for Illicit Drugs , 1993 .

[3]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[4]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Final-offer arbitration in major league baseball: A nonparametric analysis , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[7]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  On the Economics of Illicit Drugs , 2006 .

[8]  Stuart Landon,et al.  Quality Expectations, Reputation, and Price , 1998 .

[9]  Christian Ben Lakhdar,et al.  Du marché du cannabis au marché du THC en France. Implications pour le système d’offre et les politiques de lutte contre les trafics illicites de stupéfiants , 2011 .

[10]  David A. Wise,et al.  Price Differences in almost Competitive Markets , 1979 .

[11]  M. Mouchart,et al.  Bargaining powers and market segmentation in freight transport , 2007 .

[12]  Jonathan P Caulkins,et al.  Price and purity analysis for illicit drug: data and conceptual issues. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[13]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[14]  Michael Grossman,et al.  The demand for cocaine by young adults: a rational addiction approach. , 1998, Journal of health economics.

[15]  Michel Mouchart,et al.  A double-frontier approach for measuring market imperfection , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  R. Shephard Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[17]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  A Theory of Rational Addiction , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Gregory Lewis Asymmetric Information, Adverse Selection and Online Disclosure: The Case of eBay Motors , 2011 .

[19]  Jeffrey S. DeSimone,et al.  The Relationship between Illegal Drug Prices at the Retail User and Seller Levels , 2006 .

[20]  S. Legleye,et al.  Cannabis, cocaïne, ecstasy : entre expérimentation et usage régulier , 2007 .

[21]  Tai-Yoo Kim,et al.  The Measurement of Consumption Efficiency Considering the Discrete Choice of Consumers , 2005 .

[22]  Chris Wilkins,et al.  Exploring the Structure of the Illegal Market for Cannabis , 2006 .

[23]  Rosalie Liccardo Pacula,et al.  A Search-Theoretic Model of the Retail Market for Illicit Drugs , 2009 .

[24]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  The price elasticity of hard drugs; The case of opium in the Dutch East Indies (1923-1938) , 1995 .

[25]  M. Hertzman,et al.  Money from crime: A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, DCPeter Reuter, Robert MacCoun, and Patrick Murphy Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1990, $15.00 (soft), 172 pages , 1993 .

[26]  B. Park,et al.  THE FDH ESTIMATOR FOR PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIENCY SCORES , 2000, Econometric Theory.

[27]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  Should the DEA's STRIDE Data Be Used for Economic Analyses of Markets for Illegal Drugs? , 2001 .

[28]  P. Reuter,et al.  Illegal “ lemons ” : price dispersion in cocaine and heroin markets * , 2006 .

[29]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Money from Crime: A Study of the Economics of Drug Dealing in Washington, D.C. , 1990 .

[31]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[32]  Michael Grossman,et al.  Rational Addiction and the Effect of Price on Consumption , 1991 .

[33]  Kenneth W. Clements,et al.  Pricing and Packaging: The Case of Marijuana , 2006 .

[34]  Jonathan P. Caulkins,et al.  Modeling the domestic distribution network for illicit drugs , 1997 .

[35]  Isabelle Giraudon,et al.  Monitoring Ecstasy Content in France: Results From the National Surveillance System 1999–2004 , 2007, Substance use & misuse.

[36]  John DiNardo,et al.  Law enforcement, the price of cocaine and cocaine use , 1993 .

[37]  William Rhodes,et al.  The Price of Cocaine, Heroin and Marijuana, 1981–1993 , 1994 .

[38]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Real Estate Appraisal: A Double Perspective Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[39]  J E Berg,et al.  Street sale of heroin--a profitable way of making a living? , 1993, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[40]  J. Florens,et al.  Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach , 2002 .

[41]  Jeffrey S. DeSimone,et al.  Price and Enforcement Effects on Cocaine and Marijuana Demand , 2003 .

[42]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Hedonic price function estimation in economics and marketing: revisiting Lancaster’s issue of “noncombinable” goods , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[43]  J. Anthony,et al.  From First Drug Use to Drug Dependence: Developmental Periods of Risk for Dependence upon Marijuana, Cocaine, and Alcohol , 2002, Neuropsychopharmacology.