Qualitative Belief Space Planning via Compositions

Planning under uncertainty is a fundamental problem in robotics. Classical approaches rely on a metrical representation of the world and robot's states to infer the next course of action. While these approaches are considered accurate, they are often susceptible to metric errors and tend to be costly regarding memory and time consumption. However, in some cases, relying on qualitative geometric information alone is sufficient. Hence, the issues described above become an unnecessary burden. This work presents a novel qualitative Belief Space Planning (BSP) approach, highly suitable for platforms with low-cost sensors and particularly appealing in sparse environment scenarios. Our algorithm generalizes its predecessors by avoiding any deterministic assumptions. Moreover, it smoothly incorporates spatial information propagation techniques, known as compositions. We demonstrate our algorithm in simulations and the advantage of using compositions in particular.

[1]  E. Rivlin,et al.  Incorporating Compositions in Qualitative Approaches , 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[2]  V. Indelman,et al.  Probabilistic Qualitative Localization and Mapping , 2020, 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[3]  Mark E. Campbell,et al.  Q-Link: A general planning architecture for navigation with qualitative relational information , 2018, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Shashank Pathak,et al.  A unified framework for data association aware robust belief space planning and perception , 2018, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Mark E. Campbell,et al.  Probabilistic qualitative mapping for robots , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[6]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  Planning in the continuous domain: A generalized belief space approach for autonomous navigation in unknown environments , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Ryan M. Eustice,et al.  Active visual SLAM for robotic area coverage: Theory and experiment , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Mark McClelland,et al.  Qualitative Relational Mapping for Mobile Robots with Minimal Sensing , 2014, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Mark McClelland,et al.  Qualitative relational mapping and navigation for planetary rovers , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  iSAM2: Incremental smoothing and mapping using the Bayes tree , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  A Qualitative Approach to Localization and Navigation Based on Visibility Information , 2009, COSIT.

[12]  Ubbo Visser,et al.  Egocentric qualitative spatial knowledge representation for physical robots , 2004, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Christian Freksa,et al.  On the utilization of spatial structures for cognitively plausible and efficient reasoning , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Using Orientation Information for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[15]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Tod S. Levitt,et al.  Qualitative Navigation for Mobile Robots , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[17]  R. K. Goyal,et al.  Similarity assessment for cardinal directions between extended spatial objects , 2000 .

[18]  Christoph Schlieder,et al.  Representing Visible Locations for Qualitative Navigation , 1993 .