Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures?

OBJECTIVE The inherent deformation and two-dimensional nature of panoramic radiographs jeopardise their interpretation and quantitative measurements. This study aims to estimate the degree of underestimation of available mesio-distal bone in the premolar area (comparing panoramic radiographs with multi-slice/cone-beam computer tomography [CT]) to determine the prevalence, width, length and position of the bony canal [artery] in the lateral sinus wall and to explore the prevalence, width and length of another (newly detected) bony canal at the palatal aspect of the upper canine. MATERIAL AND METHODS The distance between the distal side of the canine/first premolar and the mesial side of the first molar or the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus was measured on panoramic radiographs and corresponding multi-slice/cone-beam CT images (65 patients). Measurements were made at apical, mid-radicular and crestal regions, parallel to the occlusal plane. The presence and dimensions of the two above-mentioned intra-osseous canals were verified on multi-slice CT scans (144 patients) using reformatted cross-sectional images and/or axial slices. RESULTS For all 65 patients, panoramic radiographs underscored the mesio-distal distance of available bone in the upper premolar region (mean 2.9 mm, range 0.1-7.5 mm). An intra-osseous canal in the lateral maxillary sinus wall was clearly visible in 49.5% of the cases (mean diameter 1.4 mm). In the canine region, a bony canal was obvious in 32.9% of the cases, with a mean diameter of 1.23 mm. For both canals, there was no correlation between diameter and patient's age. CONCLUSIONS Based on the present data, cone-beam CT imaging can be recommended for visualising anatomical structures during planning of sinus augmentation procedures.

[1]  K Horner,et al.  The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  H. Traxler,et al.  Arterial blood supply of the maxillary sinus , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[3]  Christos Angelopoulos,et al.  Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  D. Laskin,et al.  Use of panoramic radiography to predict possible maxillary sinus membrane perforation during dental extraction. , 2008, Quintessence international.

[5]  R Jacobs,et al.  Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  E.A.O. guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  P Solar,et al.  Blood supply to the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  M. Alkurt,et al.  The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  D. Madjar,et al.  Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  Carlos Estrela,et al.  Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  K. Gröndahl,et al.  Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[12]  T. Testori,et al.  Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  S. Froum,et al.  Distribution of the maxillary artery as it relates to sinus floor augmentation. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  R. Marx,et al.  A Novel Aid to Elevation of the Sinus Membrane for the Sinus Lift Procedure , 2002, Implant dentistry.

[15]  S. Taschieri,et al.  Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.

[16]  M. Şençimen,et al.  Retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve: comparison between panoramic radiography and spiral computerized tomography. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  F. Ashley,et al.  Assessment of bone loss in periodontitis from panoramic radiographs. , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  R Jacobs,et al.  Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  J. Bernard,et al.  Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  A. Hirshberg,et al.  Prevalence, diameter and course of the maxillary intraosseous vascular canal with relation to sinus augmentation procedure: a radiographic study. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  W. Att,et al.  Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  P. Major,et al.  The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[24]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  M. Rohlin,et al.  Marginal bone in periodontal disease: an evaluation of image quality in panoramic and intra-oral radiography. , 1989, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[26]  Thomas Fortin,et al.  Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. , 2008, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  J. Declerck,et al.  The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography , 2000, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[28]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement , 2006, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[29]  Nikolaos Donos,et al.  Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review , 2004 .

[30]  P. Brockhurst,et al.  Distortions in panoramic radiographs. , 2002, Australian orthodontic journal.