Modeling cochlear dynamics: interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics.

A model of the cochlea was used to bridge the gap between model approaches commonly used to investigate phenomena related to otoacoustic emissions and more filter-based model approaches often used in psychoacoustics. In the present study, a nonlinear and active one-dimensional transmission line model was developed that accounts for several aspects of physiological data with a single fixed parameter set. The model shows plausible excitation patterns and an input-output function similar to the linear-compressive-linear function as hypothesized in psychoacoustics. The model shows realistic results in a two-tone suppression paradigm and a plausible growth function of the 2f(1)-f(2) component of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Finestructure was found in simulated stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAE) with realistic levels and rapid phase rotation. A plausible "threshold in quiet" including finestructure and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) could be simulated. It is further shown that psychoacoustical data of modulation detection near threshold can be explained by the mechanical dynamics of the modeled healthy cochlea. It is discussed that such a model can be used to investigate the representation of acoustic signals in healthy and impaired cochleae at this early stage of the auditory pathway for both, physiological as well as psychoacoustical paradigms.

[1]  E Zwicker,et al.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. F. Cohen Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Hendrikus Duifhuis,et al.  A Generalized Van Der Pol-Oscillator Cochlea Model , 1990 .

[5]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  T. Dau,et al.  A computational model of human auditory signal processing and perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Stephen T. Neely,et al.  An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity , 1983, Hearing Research.

[10]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D A Nelson,et al.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Threshold fine structure affects amplitude modulation perception. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. de Boer No sharpening? A challenge for cochlear mechanics , 1983 .

[15]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[16]  E. ELLIOTT,et al.  A Ripple Effect in the Audiogram , 1958, Nature.

[17]  G. Zweig,et al.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[19]  Daniele Bertaccini,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions in time-domain solutions of nonlinear non-local cochlear models. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P W van Hengel,et al.  Spatial periodicity in the cochlea: the result of interaction of spontaneous emissions? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  H. Duifhuis,et al.  Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Robin L. Davis,et al.  Complex Regulation of Spiral Ganglion Neuron Firing Patterns by Neurotrophin-3 , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Steady-state sinusoidal velocity responses of the basilar membrane in guinea pig. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions , 1983, Hearing Research.

[25]  B. Moore Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C D Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  A Dynamic Compressive Gammachirp Auditory Filterbank , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[28]  Jesko L Verhey,et al.  Automatic screening and detection of threshold fine structure , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[29]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Stephan M A Ernst,et al.  Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. Zweig,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  E de Boer No sharpening? a challenge for cochlear mechanics. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. Davis Gradients of Neurotrophins, Ion Channels, and Tuning in the Cochlea , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[39]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[40]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Qing Liu,et al.  Regional specification of threshold sensitivity and response time in CBA/CaJ mouse spiral ganglion neurons. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  S. Neely,et al.  A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[45]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  J. W. Horst,et al.  Quantification of audiogram fine-structure as a function of hearing threshold , 2003, Hearing Research.

[47]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  J. Pierce,et al.  The cochlear compromise. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  G. Long,et al.  Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  I. J. Russell,et al.  The responses of inner and outer hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea and in the mouse cochlea grown in vitro , 1986, Hearing Research.

[52]  T. Houtgast Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  A. Hudspeth Making an Effort to Listen: Mechanical Amplification in the Ear , 2008, Neuron.

[55]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Linear and nonlinear processes in temporal masking , 2002 .

[57]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.