Extent of the Decrease of 28-Day Case Fatality of Hospitalized Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Over 22 Years: Epidemiological Versus Clinical View: The MONICA/KORA Augsburg Infarction Registry

Background—No data exist regarding time trends of 28-day case fatality (CF) of patients with presumed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using epidemiological criteria, clinical criteria, and AMI classification after validation of presumed in-hospital AMI-related deaths (gold-standard criteria). Methods and Results—From 1985 to 2004, we prospectively examined all 9210 AMI patients consecutively hospitalized in a large teaching hospital by using a broad epidemiological AMI definition (WHO-MONICA). Twenty-eight-day CF decreased significantly from 32% in 1985–1986 to 18% in 2003–2004, mostly because of a reduction in early deaths (<24 hours). When applying the clinical AMI definition, most of the early deaths were not counted as AMI related. A retrospective validation process from a sample of all early deceased patients by the epidemiological AMI definition (388/2076) and a prospective validation of the complete cohort in 2005–2006 revealed that only about 50% of early deaths are reclassified as a real fatal AMI using newer criteria resulting in a 28-day CF of 23% in 1985–1986 and 11% in 2005–2006. The difference between the AMI 28-day CF by applying gold-standard criteria and the clinical AMI 28-day CF (18% in 1985–1986 and 7% in 2005–2006) has decreased during recent years. Conclusions—The application of broad epidemiological criteria for AMI overestimates 28-day CF by almost 2-fold compared with gold-standard criteria (after validation of early deaths) and almost 3-fold compared to the clinical definition. The growing similarity in 28-day CF between the clinically based definition and the gold-standard criteria implies that recent clinical-based registries may represent a realistic picture of trends regarding in-hospital AMI mortality.

[1]  C. Meisinger,et al.  20‐year trends in clinical characteristics, therapy and short‐term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction according to presenting electrocardiogram: the MONICA / KORA AMI Registry (1985–2004) , 2008, Journal of internal medicine.

[2]  R. Luepker Decline in incident coronary heart disease: why are the rates falling? , 2008, Circulation.

[3]  Simon Capewell,et al.  Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Evaluation in the Community , 2006, Circulation.

[5]  J. Gore,et al.  Trends in community mortality due to coronary heart disease. , 2006, American heart journal.

[6]  D. Levy,et al.  A comparison of death certificate out-of-hospital coronary heart disease death with physician-adjudicated sudden cardiac death. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  G. Amit,et al.  What Have the New Definition of Acute Myocardial Infarction and the Introduction of Troponin Measurement Done to the Coronary Care Unit? , 2004, Cardiology.

[8]  J. Senges,et al.  Why do we need prospective registries in patients with acute myocardial infarction? , 2003, European heart journal.

[9]  P. Silcocks,et al.  Changing the diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction in patients with a suspected heart attack affects the measurement of 30 day mortality but not long term survival , 2002, Heart.

[10]  C. Meisinger,et al.  What is the real hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction? Epidemiological vs clinical view. , 2002, European heart journal.

[11]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[12]  V. Roger,et al.  Validation of death certificate diagnosis of out-of-hospital coronary heart disease deaths in Olmsted County, Minnesota. , 2000, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Contribution of trends in survival and coronar y-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Folsom,et al.  Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease, 1987 to 1994. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Simon,et al.  A new system for classification of cardiac death as arrhythmic, ischemic, or due to myocardial pump failure. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  B. Gersh Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Evaluation in the Community , 2007 .

[17]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. , 1999, Lancet.

[18]  U. Keil,et al.  Case finding, data quality aspects and comparability of myocardial infarction registers: results of a south German register study. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  Principal Investigators,et al.  The World Health Organization MONICA project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collabaration , 1988 .

[21]  M. Kornitzer,et al.  The World Health Organization MONICA Project (Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): A major international Collaboration , 1988 .