Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances.

Participants made judgments about stimulus materials in which there were 2 possible causes of an outcome. One of these was a common factor, a factor present in all instances presented for judgment, and the other was a positive covariate of the outcome. Instead of interpreting the positive covariate as the cause, participants consistently preferred an interpretation in which the common factor was the cause and the positive covariate enabled the cause to produce its effect. Participants' judgments of both interpretations were predicted by the proportion of instances that were confirmatory for the interpretation and not by deltaP. The findings support a hypothesis that people have a multirole conceptualization of causality including, in addition to the roles of cause and effect, that of an enabler, a factor the presence of which ensures that a thing is in a state of readiness to produce a particular effect.

[1]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Contributions to information integration theory , 1991 .

[2]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[3]  Serial positive patterning: Implications for “occasion setting” , 1982 .

[4]  G. Chapman,et al.  Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. , 1981 .

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[7]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[8]  P. C. Price,et al.  Judgmental overshadowing: Further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[9]  G. Williams.  Causation in the Law , 1961, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[10]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation, and probability. , 1998 .

[11]  D. Shanks,et al.  Human instrumental learning: a critical review of data and theory. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[12]  P. Holland,et al.  Conditioning of simultaneous and serial feature-positive discriminations , 1981 .

[13]  Harriet Shaklee,et al.  Methods of Assessing Strategies for Judging Covariation between Events. , 1983 .

[14]  Harriet Shaklee,et al.  Sources of error in judging event covariations: Effects of memory demands. , 1982 .

[15]  B. Weiner.  "Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  E. Pols.  Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity , 1976 .

[17]  D R Shanks,et al.  Selectional processes in causality judgment , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[18]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  The effect of representations of binary variables on judgment of influence , 1983 .

[19]  P. Cheng,et al.  A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[21]  F. Vallée-Tourangeau,et al.  Selective associations and causality judgments: Presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one. , 1993 .

[22]  J. Mackie,et al.  The cement of the universe : a study of causation , 1977 .

[23]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[24]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  The display of information and the judgment of contingency. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[25]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VII: Teaching for Proportional Reasoning , 1979 .

[26]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Causation and Association , 1996 .

[27]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Causal inferences as perceptual judgments , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[28]  THE REFUTATION OF DETERMINISM , 1969 .

[29]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : conditioned inhibition , 1985 .

[30]  H. Shaklee,et al.  A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[31]  A. Lawson,et al.  Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VI: Correlational Reasoning , 1978 .

[32]  P. Cheng,et al.  Covariation in natural causal induction. , 1992, Psychological review.

[33]  Hal R. Arkes,et al.  Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables. , 1983 .

[34]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Associative Accounts of Causality Judgment , 1988 .

[35]  A. Honoré,et al.  Causation in the law , 1960 .

[36]  G. Chapman,et al.  Cue interaction in human contingency judgment , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[37]  T. Troward.  Causes and conditions. , 1919 .

[38]  L. Allan.  Human contingency judgments: rule based or associative? , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Franz von Kutschera,et al.  Causation , 1993, J. Philos. Log..

[41]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Judging interevent contingencies: Being right for the wrong reasons , 1986 .

[42]  H. M. Jenkins,et al.  The Judgment of Contingency and the Nature of the Response Alternatives , 1980 .

[43]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[44]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation. , 1993 .

[45]  P. Cheng.  From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .