The Communication Bottleneck in Knitwear Design: Analysis and Computing Solutions

Communication between different members of a designteam often poses difficulties. This paper reports onthe results of a detailed empirical study ofcommunication in over twenty British, German andItalian knitwear companies. The knitwear designprocess is shared by the designers, who plan thevisual and tactile appearance of the garments, and thetechnicians, who have to realise the garment on aknitting machine. They comprise a typical but smalldesign team whose members have different backgroundsand expertise. Knitwear design allows a detailedanalysis of the causes and effects of communicationbreakdown. Designers specify their designsinaccurately, incompletely and inconsistently;technicians interpret these specifications accordingto their previous experience of similar designs, andproduce garments very different from the designers'original intentions. Knitwear is inherently difficultto describe, as no simple and complete notationexists; and the relationship between visual appearanceand structure and technical properties of knittedfabric is subtle and complex. Designers andtechnicians have different cognitive approaches andare very different people. At the same time theinteraction between designers and technicians is badlymanaged in many companies. This paper argues thatimproving the accuracy and reliability of designers'specifications would significantly enhance the designprocess. It concludes with a description of thearchitecture of an intelligent automatic design systemthat generates technically correct designs from thedesigners' customary notations.

[1]  J. Lofland,et al.  ANALYTIC ETHNOGRAPHY , 1995 .

[2]  John C. Tang,et al.  A framework for understanding the workspace activity of design teams , 1988, CSCW '88.

[3]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Spaces for creating context & awareness - designing a collaborative virtual work space for (landscape) architects , 1999, HCI.

[4]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  An ethnographic methodology for design process analysis , 1999 .

[5]  J. Johnson,et al.  Intelligent Support for Communication Difficulties in Conceptual Design , 1999 .

[6]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Adaptation of Sources of Inspiration in Knitwear Design , 2003 .

[7]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  Against Ambiguity , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Beyond being there , 1992, CHI.

[9]  Angi Voß Towards a Methodology for Case Adaptation , 1996, ECAI.

[10]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[11]  Charles McNeil,et al.  Notes , 1901, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[13]  John Lee,et al.  Conversations with graphics: implications for the design of natural language/graphics interfaces , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  David G. Ullman,et al.  What to do next: Using problem status to determine the course of action , 1997 .

[15]  Ian Kelly,et al.  Interactive generative systems for conceptual design: An empirical perspective , 1999, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[17]  Michael Barr,et al.  The Emperor's New Mind , 1989 .

[18]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Spatial interpretation of domain objects integrated into a freeform electronic whiteboard , 1998, UIST '98.

[19]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sketch interpretation in design communication , 1999 .

[20]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[22]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Coherence: an approach to representing ethnographic analyses in systems design , 1999 .

[23]  John C. Tang,et al.  VideoDraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing , 1990, CHI '90.

[24]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Case studies of coordination activities and problems in collaborative design , 1997 .

[25]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Sources of inspiration: a language of design , 2000 .

[26]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[27]  Ac Rianne Valkenburg,et al.  The reflective practice of design teams , 1998 .

[28]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings , 1988, CSCW '88.

[29]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Analysis of design projects , 1999 .

[30]  John C. Tang Listing, Drawing and Gesturing in Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams , 1989 .

[31]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[32]  Scott L. Minneman,et al.  The DrawStream station: a tool for distributed and asynchronous chats about sketches and artifacts , 1999, HCI.

[33]  S. Bly,et al.  Commune: a shared drawing surface , 1990, COCS '90.

[34]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Intelligent support for communication in design teams: garment shape specifications in the knitwear industry , 2000 .

[35]  Tim Smithers,et al.  Towards a Knowledge Level Theory of Design Process , 1998, AID.

[36]  Thomas Kvan,et al.  Tools and Channels of Communication: Dealing with the Effects of Computer Mediation on Design Communication , 1998, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[37]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Design ’96 , 1996, Springer Netherlands.

[38]  Michael Smyth,et al.  Real-Time Communication Between Dispersed Work Groups via Speech and Drawing , 1993, Wirtsch..

[39]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[40]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  CAD Systems and the Division of Labour in Knitwear Design , 1994, Woman, Work and Computerization.

[42]  Eileen Green,et al.  Women, work and computerization: Breaking old boundaries - Building new forms , 1994 .

[43]  Jeremy Busby,et al.  The neglect of feedback in engineering design organisations , 1998 .

[44]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper , 1998 .

[46]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  A garment design system using constrained Bézier curves , 2000 .

[47]  John E. E. Sharpe,et al.  AI System Support for Conceptual Design , 1996 .

[48]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[49]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[50]  Tim Smithers,et al.  ON KNOWLEDGE LEVEL THEORIES OF DESIGN PROCESS , 1996 .

[51]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Software Development Process , 1999 .

[52]  Michael Scaife,et al.  Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A Case Study of Software Development for Fashion Designers , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[53]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management , 2000 .

[54]  Harry J. Klingler ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT , 1951 .

[55]  M. Agar The professional stranger : an informal introduction to ethnography , 1981 .

[56]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Intelligent Support for Knitwear Design , 1997 .

[57]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Observations of teamwork and social processes in design , 1995 .

[58]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  DESIGN INSPIRATION AND DESIGN PERFORMANCE , 1997 .

[59]  A. Carlisle Scott,et al.  Practical guide to knowledge acquisition , 1991 .

[60]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[61]  A. J. Tunnicliffe,et al.  Knowlege elicitation in design , 1991 .

[62]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Task as a moderator for the effects of group support systems on group influence processes , 1997 .

[63]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Expertise and designer burnout , 1999 .

[64]  John C. Tang,et al.  Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing , 1991, TOIS.

[65]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[66]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  KADS: a modelling approach to knowledge engineering , 1992 .

[67]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Object-Oriented Modeling and Design , 1991, TOOLS.

[68]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[69]  John Bowers,et al.  Getting others to get it right: an ethnography of design work in the fashion industry , 1996, CSCW '96.

[70]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Modeling Language User Guide , 1998, J. Database Manag..

[71]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology , 1999 .

[72]  Gillian Symon,et al.  The Work of IT System Developers in Context: An Organizational Case Study , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[73]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[74]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[75]  John C. Tang,et al.  VideoWhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration , 1991, CHI.

[76]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  AN ARCHITECTURE FOR THE INTELLIGENT SUPPORT OF KNITWEAR DESIGN , 1996 .

[77]  John C. Tang Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[78]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[79]  B J Linney,et al.  What to do next? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[80]  Mary A. Meyer,et al.  How to apply the anthropological technique of participant observation to knowledge acquisition for expert systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[81]  Duncan Sanderson,et al.  Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts , 1998 .

[82]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  A Study of Case Adaptation Systems , 1996 .

[83]  James R. Rinderle,et al.  Concurrent design , 1992, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[84]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  KADS : a principled approach to knowledge-based system development , 1993 .