Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics

The costs of meeting regulatory requirements and market restrictions guided by regulatory criteria are substantial impediments to the commercialization of transgenic crops. Although a cautious approach may have been prudent initially, we argue that some regulatory requirements can now be modified to reduce costs and uncertainty without compromising safety. Long-accepted plant breeding methods for incorporating new diversity into crop varieties, experience from two decades of research on and commercialization of transgenic crops, and expanding knowledge of plant genome structure and dynamics all indicate that if a gene or trait is safe, the genetic engineering process itself presents little potential for unexpected consequences that would not be identified or eliminated in the variety development process before commercialization. We propose that as in conventional breeding, regulatory emphasis should be on phenotypic rather than genomic characteristics once a gene or trait has been shown to be safe.

[1]  Allison K. Wilson,et al.  Genome Scrambling - Myth or Reality? Transformation-Induced Mutations in Transgenic Crop Plants , 2004 .

[2]  D. M. Wright,et al.  The incidence of three virus diseases of winter oilseed rape in England and Wales in the 1991/92 and 1992/93 growing seasons. , 1994 .

[3]  D. Gonsalves Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya: a case study. , 1998, Annual review of phytopathology.

[4]  J. Messing,et al.  Mosaic organization of orthologous sequences in grass genomes. , 2002, Genome research.

[5]  Jerry Avorn Technology , 1929, Nature.

[6]  J. S. James Consumer knowledge and acceptance of agricultural biotechnology vary , 2004 .

[7]  A. Haslberger Codex guidelines for GM foods include the analysis of unintended effects , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Benjamin Yang "Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist's View of Genetically Modified Foods". , 2005, Discovery medicine.

[9]  J. Nap,et al.  Review: Biosafety of E. coli β-glucuronidase (GUS) in plants , 1998, Transgenic Research.

[10]  Keith Redenbaugh,et al.  Safety Assessment of Genetically Engineered Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study of the Flavr Savr Tomato , 1992 .

[11]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  Dangerous Liaisons?: When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives , 2003 .

[12]  Joachim Messing,et al.  Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Tanksley The Genetic, Developmental, and Molecular Bases of Fruit Size and Shape Variation in Tomato , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[14]  M. Mayo Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants. The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. Washington DC: National Academy Press (2002), pp. 320, £30.95. ISBN 0-309-08263-3 , 2003, Experimental Agriculture.

[15]  J. Botto,et al.  The plant cell , 2007, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[16]  P. Schulze-Lefert,et al.  A contiguous 66-kb barley DNA sequence provides evidence for reversible genome expansion. , 2000, Genome research.

[17]  R. Downey Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants , 2003 .

[18]  C.A.R. Hoare,et al.  A Hard Act to Follow , 2000, High. Order Symb. Comput..

[19]  J. Sandoe,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of endocarditis: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. , 2006, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[20]  J. Carlson,et al.  Biological confinement of genetically engineered organisms. , 2004 .

[21]  D. Schubert,et al.  Silencing in Arabidopsis T-DNA Transformants: The Predominant Role of a Gene-Specific RNA Sensing Mechanism versus Position Effects , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[22]  K. Redenbaugh,et al.  Regulatory challenges reduce opportunities for horticultural biotechnology , 2004 .

[23]  A. M. Harten Mutation Breeding: Theory and Practical Applications , 1998 .

[24]  E. Benzinger,et al.  Detection of Intraspecific DNA Content Variation in Zea mays L. by Flow Cytometry , 1989 .

[25]  D. McElroy Sustaining agbiotechnology through lean times , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  M. Schmid,et al.  Genome-Wide Insertional Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003, Science.

[27]  Armin Spök,et al.  RISK ASSESSMENT OF GMO PRODUCTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Toxicity assessment, allergenicity assessment and substantial equivalence in practice and proposals for improvement and standardisation , 2004 .

[28]  Archana Sharma,et al.  Intraspecific variation of nuclear DNA inCapsicum annuum L. , 1990, Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Deynze Crop Biotechnology: Feeds for Livestock , 2004 .

[30]  S. Jain Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement , 2001, Euphytica.

[31]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Access to intellectual property is a major obstacle to developing transgenic horticultural crops , 2004 .

[32]  S. Wessler Plant transposable elements. A hard act to follow. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[33]  Relative extrema of Legendre functions of the second kind , 1990 .

[34]  T. Giordani,et al.  Genome plasticity during seed germination in Festuca arundinacea , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[35]  Nina V. Fedoroff,et al.  Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist's View of Genetically Modified Foods , 2004 .

[36]  D. Kennedy,et al.  A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition , 1988 .

[38]  C. Stewart,et al.  The utility of green fluorescent protein in transgenic plants , 2022 .

[39]  E. D. Earle,et al.  Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species , 1991, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[40]  R. Verpoorte,et al.  Metabolic Engineering of Plant Secondary Metabolism , 2000, Springer Netherlands.

[41]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Safety Assessment of the Neomycin Phosphotransferase II (NPTII) Protein , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[42]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[43]  Genomics, Genetic Engineering, and Domestication of Crops , 2003, Science.

[44]  D. Letourneau Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation , 2001 .

[45]  Mae-Wan Ho,et al.  Cauliflower Mosaic Viral Promoter - A Recipe for Disaster? , 1999 .

[46]  M. Feldman,et al.  Allopolyploidy-Induced Rapid Genome Evolution in the Wheat (Aegilops–Triticum) Group , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[47]  R. Flavell,et al.  Selectable Marker Genes: Safe For Plants? , 1992, Bio/Technology.

[48]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  A complex history of rearrangement in an orthologous region of the maize, sorghum, and rice genomes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  H. Fu,et al.  Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Safety assessment of recombinant green fluorescent protein orally administered to weaned rats. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[51]  S. Tanksley,et al.  RFLP analysis of the size of chromosomal segments retained around the Tm-2 locus of tomato during backcross breeding , 1989, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[52]  Henry I. Miller,et al.  The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution , 2004 .

[53]  H. Saedler,et al.  Plant Transposable Elements , 1986 .

[54]  C. D. Nickell,et al.  Relationship between genome size and maturity group in soybean , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[55]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  Nested Retrotransposons in the Intergenic Regions of the Maize Genome , 1996, Science.

[56]  A. Dietz-Pfeilstetter,et al.  Variability of organ-specific expression of reporter genes in transgenic plants. , 1996 .

[57]  J. Saunders,et al.  An assessment of the risks associated with the use of antibiotic resistance genes in genetically modified plants: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[58]  S. Strauss Regulating Biotechnology as though Gene Function Mattered , 2003 .

[59]  Mark Jung,et al.  SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines , 2002, BMC Genetics.

[60]  M. Koornneef,et al.  The root-knot nematode resistance gene (Mi) in tomato: construction of a molecular linkage map and identification of dominant cDNA markers in resistant genotypes. , 1992, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[61]  B. Lockhart,et al.  Viral sequences integrated into plant genomes. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[62]  L. Gianessi Sidebar: Biotechnology expands pest-management options for horticulture , 2004 .

[63]  P. Beyer,et al.  Golden Indica and Japonica Rice Lines Amenable to Deregulation1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[64]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[65]  Stewart Cn,et al.  The Utility of Green Fluorescent Protein in Transgenic Plants , 2001 .

[66]  V. Ambros,et al.  Role of MicroRNAs in Plant and Animal Development , 2003, Science.

[67]  H. Klee,et al.  Natural Resources California Agriculture Title Despite benefits , commercialization of transgenic horticultural crops lags , 2004 .

[68]  M. Matsuoka,et al.  Generating high-yielding varieties by genetic manipulation of plant architecture. , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[69]  N. Skovgaard Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods. Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects , 2005 .

[70]  Evaluation of Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods Report of a Joint FAO / WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology , 2001 .