Characterization of Dynamic Response of Structures With Uncertainty by Using Gaussian Processes

Characterizing dynamic characteristics of structures with uncertainty is an important task that provides critical predictive information for structural design, assessment, and control. In practical applications, sampling is the fundamental approach to uncertainty analysis but has to be conducted under various constraints. To address the frequently encountered data scarcity issue, in the present paper Gaussian processes are employed to predict and quantify structural dynamic responses, especially responses under uncertainty. A self-contained description of Gaussian processes is presented within the Bayesian framework with implementation details, and then a series of case studies are carried out using a cyclically symmetric structure that is highly sensitive to uncertainties. Structural frequency responses are predicted with data sparsely sampled within the full frequency range. Based on the inferred credible intervals, a measure is defined to quantify the potential risk of response maxima. Gaussian process emulation is proposed for Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis to reduce data acquisition costs. It is shown that Gaussian processes can be an efficient data-based tool for analyzing structural dynamic responses in the presence of uncertainty. Meanwhile, some technical challenges in the implementation of Gaussian processes are discussed.

[1]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Computationally Efficient Convolved Multiple Output Gaussian Processes , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Jr. Roy Craig,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses - An overview , 2000 .

[3]  Christian Soize,et al.  Probabilistic model identification of uncertainties in computational models for dynamical systems and experimental validation , 2008 .

[4]  Christian Soize A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics , 2000 .

[5]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[6]  A. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Gaussian Process Time Series Model for Life Prognosis of Metallic Structures , 2009 .

[7]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Dynamic Response Predictions for a Mistuned Industrial Turbomachinery Rotor Using Reduced-Order Modeling , 2002 .

[8]  Gerhart I. Schuëller,et al.  Efficient stochastic structural analysis using Guyan reduction , 2011, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[9]  Denis S. Whitehead,et al.  The Maximum Factor by Which Forced Vibration of Blades Can Increase Due to Mistuning , 1996 .

[10]  Timothy P. Waters,et al.  Component mode synthesis as a framework for uncertainty analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Uncertainty in structural dynamics: Experimental validation of a Wishart random matrix model , 2009 .

[12]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Derivatives of Complex Eigenvectors Using Nelson's Method , 2000 .

[13]  Brian R. Mace,et al.  Joint Uncertainty Propagation in Linear Structural Dynamics Using Stochastic Reduced Basis Methods , 2009 .

[14]  Jus Kocijan,et al.  Fixed-structure Gaussian process model , 2009, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[15]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[16]  J. L. Maryak,et al.  Bayesian Heuristic Approach to Discrete and Global Optimization , 1999, Technometrics.

[17]  R. Murray-Smith,et al.  Nonparametric Identification of Linearizations and Uncertainty using Gaussian Process Models – Application to Robust Wheel Slip Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[19]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Structural dynamic analysis using Gaussian process emulators , 2010 .

[20]  Jerry H. Griffin,et al.  Forced Response of Turbine Engine Bladed Disks and Sensitivity to Harmonic Mistuning , 2001 .

[21]  Jiong Tang,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Structural Dynamics by Using Two-Level Gaussian Processes , 2011 .

[22]  Torsten Fransson,et al.  A comparison of two finite element reduction techniques for mistuned bladed disks , 2002 .

[23]  Gordon Lightbody,et al.  Gaussian process approach for modelling of nonlinear systems , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[24]  J. H. Griffin,et al.  A Fundamental Model of Mistuning for a Single Family of Modes , 2002 .

[25]  Noureddine Atalla,et al.  Validation, performance, convergence and application of free interface component mode synthesis , 2001 .

[26]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Component-Mode-Based Reduced Order Modeling Techniques for Mistuned Bladed Disks—Part I: Theoretical Models , 2001 .

[27]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Stephen P. Brooks,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application , 1998 .

[29]  M. T. Bah,et al.  Stochastic Component Mode Synthesis , 2003 .

[30]  Moustapha Mbaye,et al.  A Reduced-Order Model of Detuned Cyclic Dynamical Systems With Geometric Modifications Using a Basis of Cyclic Modes , 2010 .

[31]  John Skilling,et al.  Data analysis : a Bayesian tutorial , 1996 .

[32]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators , 2009, Technometrics.

[33]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[34]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Component-Mode-Based Monte Carlo Simulation for Efficient Probabilistic Vibration Analysis , 2006 .

[35]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Gaussian process emulators for the stochastic finite element method , 2011 .