Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer

In this paper, we propose a mammogram classification scheme to classify the breast tissues as normal, benign or malignant. Feature matrix is generated using GLCM to all the detailed coefficients from 2D-DWT of the region of interest (ROI) of a mammogram. To derive the relevant features from the feature matrix, we take the help of t-test and F-test separately. The relevant features are used in a BPNN classifier for classification. Two standard databases MIAS and DDSM are used for the validation of the proposed scheme. It is observed that t-test based relevant features outperforms to that of F-test with respect to accuracy. In addition to the suggested scheme, the competent schemes are also simulated for comparative analysis. It is observed that the proposed scheme has a better say with respect to accuracy and area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC). The accuracy measures are computed with respect to normal vs. abnormal and benign vs. malignant. For MIAS database these accuracy measures are 98.0% and 94.2% respectively, whereas for DDSM database they are 98.8% and 97.4%.

[1]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Jacob D. Furst,et al.  CO-OCCURRENCE MATRICES FOR VOLUMETRIC DATA , 2004 .

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[5]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  AUTOMATED DETECTION OF MASSES IN MAMMOGRAMS , 2005 .

[8]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  Fairgray Ra House surgeon's salaries. , 1987 .

[10]  V. Cogliano International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) , 2018, The Grants Register 2019.

[11]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[12]  Ioan Buciu,et al.  Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[13]  J. Jona A Hybrid Swarm Optimization approach for Feature set reduction in Digital Mammograms , 2012 .

[14]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[15]  Nazar Zaki,et al.  Detection of Masses in Digital Mammogram Using Second Order Statistics and Artificial Neural Network , 2011 .

[16]  Essam A. Rashed,et al.  Multiresolution mammogram analysis in multilevel decomposition , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography and breast cancer: the new era , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  B Sahiner,et al.  False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  Onur Osman,et al.  MAMMOGRAPHIC MASS CLASSIFICATION USING WAVELET BASED SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE , 2009 .

[20]  F. Albregtsen Statistical Texture Measures Computed from Gray Level Coocurrence Matrices , 2008 .

[21]  Atam P. Dhawan,et al.  Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  A. Bachelor GLOSSARY OF TERMS GLOSSARY OF TERMS , 2010 .

[23]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  Ahmet Sertbas,et al.  Mammographical mass detection and classification using Local Seed Region Growing-Spherical Wavelet Transform (LSRG-SWT) hybrid scheme , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.