Assessing the transferability of statistical predictive models for leaf area index between two airborne discrete return LiDAR sensor designs within multiple intensely managed Loblolly pine forest locations in the south-eastern USA

Leaf area is an important forest structural variable which serves as the primary means of mass and energy exchange within vegetated ecosystems. The objective of the current study was to determine if leaf area index (LAI) could be estimated accurately and consistently in five intensively managed pine plantation forests using two multiple-return airborne LiDAR datasets. Field measurements of LAI were made using the LiCOR LAI2000 and LAI2200 instruments within 116 plots were established of varying size and within a variety of stand conditions (i.e. stand age, nutrient regime and stem density) in North Carolina and Virginia in 2008 and 2013. A number of common LiDAR return height and intensity distribution metrics were calculated (e.g. average return height), in addition to ten indices, with two additional variants, utilized in the surrounding literature which have been used to estimate LAI and fractional cover, were calculated from return heights and intensity, for each plot extent. Each of the indices was assessed for correlation with each other, and was used as independent variables in linear regression analysis with field LAI as the dependent variable. All LiDAR derived metrics were also entered into a forward stepwise linear regression. The results from each of the indices varied from an R2 of 0.33 (S.E. 0.87) to 0.89 (S.E. 0.36). Those indices calculated using ratios of all returns produced the strongest correlations, such as the Above and Below Ratio Index (ABRI) and Laser Penetration Index 1 (LPI1). The regression model produced from a combination of three metrics did not improve correlations greatly (R2 0.90; S.E. 0.35). The results indicate that LAI can be predicted over a range of intensively managed pine plantation forest environments accurately when using different LiDAR sensor designs. Those indices which incorporated counts of specific return numbers (e.g. first returns) or return intensity correlated poorly with field measurements. There were disparities between the number of different types of returns and intensity values when comparing the results from two LiDAR sensors, indicating that predictive models developed using such metrics are not transferable between datasets with different acquisition parameters. Each of the indices were significantly correlated with one another, with one exception (LAI proxy), in particular those indices calculated from all returns, which indicates similarities in information content for those indices. It can then be argued that LiDAR indices have reached a similar stage in development to those calculated from optical-spectral sensors, but which offer a number of advantages, such as the reduction or removal of saturation issues in areas of high biomass.

[1]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index of Boreal Conifer Forests Using Landsat TM Images , 1996 .

[2]  P. Stenberg.  Correcting LAI-2000 estimates for the clumping of needles in shoots of conifers , 1996 .

[3]  K. Lim,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests , 2003 .

[4]  S. Running,et al.  Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data , 2007 .

[5]  R. Leuning,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates , 2005 .

[6]  C. Mallet,et al.  Processing full-waveform lidar data: Modelling raw signals , 2015 .

[7]  L. Monika Moskal,et al.  Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR , 2009 .

[8]  Lawrence A. Corp,et al.  NASA Goddard's LiDAR, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) Airborne Imager , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[9]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[10]  A. Kuusk,et al.  Impact of understory vegetation on forest canopy reflectance and remotely sensed LAI estimates , 2006 .

[11]  N. Broge,et al.  Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density , 2001 .

[12]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[13]  Kaiguang Zhao,et al.  Lidar-based mapping of leaf area index and its use for validating GLOBCARBON satellite LAI product in a temperate forest of the southern USA , 2009 .

[14]  Jacob Strunk,et al.  Effects of lidar pulse density and sample size on a model-assisted approach to estimate forest inventory variables , 2012 .

[15]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[16]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Separating leaves from trunks and branches with dual-wavelength terrestrial lidar scanning , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[17]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest , 2008 .

[18]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones , 2009 .

[19]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[20]  Alistair M. S. Smith,et al.  Discrete Return Lidar in Natural Resources: Recommendations for Project Planning, Data Processing, and Deliverables , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Estimation of forest structure metrics relevant to hydrologic modelling using coordinate transformation of airborne laser scanning data , 2012 .

[22]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data , 2005 .

[23]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[24]  P. Gessler,et al.  Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: An evaluation for the Inland Northwest, USA , 2009 .

[25]  Chris Hopkinson.  The Influence of Lidar Acquisition Settings on Canopy Penetration and Laser Pulse Return Characteristics , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf Area and Above- and Belowground Growth Responses of Loblolly Pine to Nutrient and Water Additions , 1998, Forest Science.

[27]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[28]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[29]  J. Norman,et al.  Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture , 1991 .

[30]  Weimin Ju,et al.  Distributed hydrological model for mapping evapotranspiration using remote sensing inputs , 2005 .

[31]  Valerie A. Thomas,et al.  Estimating leaf area index at multiple heights within the understorey component of Loblolly pine forests from airborne discrete-return lidar , 2016 .

[32]  Mark Sanford,et al.  Combined Use of Airborne Lidar and DBInSAR Data to Estimate LAI in Temperate Mixed Forests , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Valerie A. Thomas,et al.  Estimating leaf area index in intensively managed pine plantations using airborne laser scanner data , 2012 .

[34]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  On the relationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site , 2005 .

[35]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[36]  A. Chehbouni,et al.  Monitoring wheat phenology and irrigation in Central Morocco: On the use of relationships between evapotranspiration, crops coefficients, leaf area index and remotely-sensed vegetation indices , 2006 .

[37]  K. Itten,et al.  Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction , 2006 .

[38]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach. , 1992 .

[39]  A. Huete,et al.  A review of vegetation indices , 1995 .

[40]  Richard K. Broughton,et al.  Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain , 2009 .

[41]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites , 1999 .

[42]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[43]  E. Næsset.  Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data , 2009 .

[44]  S. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of tools for remotely estimating leaf area index in loblolly pine plantations , 2006 .

[45]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Mapping LAI in a Norway spruce forest using airborne laser scanning , 2009 .

[46]  J. Reitberger,et al.  Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees , 2008 .

[47]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..