Dealing With External Factors in the Electricity Generation Sector: Nuclear vs. Other Baseload Technologies

The international literature presents several studies about the economics of Power Plants, however these analyses usually consider only the classical accounts related to Construction, Operation & Maintenance, Fuel and Decommissioning cost. Beside these accounts there are many factors, from now on named External Factors (e.g. social acceptability, Security of Fuel supply, etc.) able to heavily determine the profitability and the feasibility of a certain investment. This paper lists the External Factors and, under this prospective, ranks under different scenarios the following technologies suitable for the base-load: hydro, coal, oil, gas and nuclear. First the paper provides a list of these factors considering the international literature. As second step each factor is analyzed and quantified. Then an overall multi-attribute model, based on the Quality Function Deployment approach, is introduced to obtain a weight for each factor, dividing its impact into three different sustainability dimensions (economic, environmental, social), each weighted according to the investor sensitiveness. Finally the factor weights and their performances are coupled to obtain an overall ranking specific describing the specific environmental coming out by the combination of conditions and investors’ strategies. The results show that hydroelectric plants are usually the best solution, however there is a shortage of new sites for the further deployment of these plants, therefore other plants have to be considered to fulfill the energy growth. Coal and Nuclear could be a good choice even if each type of plant has its strengths and weaknesses. Nuclear technology has good performances on “fuel supply and environmental impact factors”, but his main weak is on the social acceptability. On the opposite the oil and gas -fired plants are always the worst choice. It is important to highlight that some factors are quantified using historical data (for the nuclear sector related to GEN II reactors). This assumption does not bias the analysis since the progress in nuclear energy is present as well as in other technologies. However is clear from the analysis that the innovative passive reactors could overcome other technologies and become the most suitable choice for the base load generation.© 2009 ASME

[1]  R Vance,et al.  Uranium 2005: Resources, Production and Demand , 2006 .

[2]  Cpm Cor Govers,et al.  What and how about quality function deployment (QFD) , 1996 .

[3]  D. Pearce Energy Policy and Externalities: an Overview , 2002 .

[4]  Pramod Kale,et al.  Sustainable development—Critical issues , 1992 .

[5]  Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Development Perspective , 2000 .

[6]  Donald A. Beattie New Energy Technologies , 1980 .

[7]  Stefan Hirschberg,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Accident Risks in Fossil, Hydro, and Nuclear Energy Chains , 2008 .

[8]  S. Hirschberg,et al.  Sustainability of Electricity Supply Technologies under German Conditions: A Comparative Evaluation , 2004 .

[9]  S. M Rashad,et al.  Nuclear power and the environment: comparative assessment of environmental and health impacts of electricity-generating systems , 2000 .

[10]  William E Mooz Cost Analysis of Light Water Reactor Power Plants , 1978 .

[11]  C.P.M. Govers What and how of quality function deployment , 1993 .

[12]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Alfons Bora,et al.  Final Report to the European Commission , 2004 .

[14]  Alfred Voß Energy in a Sustainable Development Perspective , 2006 .

[15]  B. K. Grimes,et al.  Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants , 1978 .

[16]  Judith Gurney BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .