Evaluation of Wayfinding Performance and Workload on Electronic Map Interface

Electronic map (E-map) is important to support wayfinding, especially for finding unfamiliar routes in the current Web mapping service applications. This study examined the effects of four designing factors including Map Size, Map Type, Direction key, and Zoom function as well as the ability of sense of direction (SOD) and gender differences on the wayfinding performance for a simulated E-map interface. The results indicate that participants with a better SOD would have the faster response time in average and would lower overall workload for target task. Furthermore, participants would have higher workload as the response time is increasing. The interaction effect of SOD and map type would affect the mean response time for target and direction tasks. Participants with good SOD using mixed map have the faster mean response time than ones of poor SOD. For direction task, males with good SOD and good SOD using E-map would have faster mean response time. In addition, both males using mixed map and females using E-map would have faster mean response time.

[1]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  On the Robustness of Qualitative Distance- and Direction-Reasoning * 1 , 1995 .

[2]  Julie Dillemuth Map Design Evaluation for Mobile Display , 2005 .

[3]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience , 2008 .

[4]  J. Xia,et al.  The wayfinding process relationships between decision-making and landmark utility. , 2008 .

[5]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. , 2002 .

[6]  Yoshiaki Takeuchi,et al.  Individual differences in wayfinding strategies , 2003 .

[7]  Gary L. Allen,et al.  Human spatial memory : remembering where , 2004 .

[8]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[10]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .

[11]  Lisa M. Stevenson,et al.  Real-World Knowledge through Real-World Maps: A Developmental Guide for Navigating the Educational Terrain , 2002 .

[12]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Memory of Real Environments, Virtual Environments, and Maps , 2004 .