Robust control for a two-axis gimbaled sensor system with multivariable feedback systems

A dynamic model for the stabilisation loop of a two-axis gimbaled sensor system is formulated and system parameters have been identified by practical experiments. The validity of the dynamic model is illustrated by the experimental and simulation result. The Lead-proportional-integral (PI) controller design using a loop-shaping method based on the frequency response for the stabilisation loop of the sensor system is realised. This practical design approach has been proven to be simple and robust in actual application. The robust H∞ controller design approach combining model matching and mixed sensitivity problem to improve the command following and disturbance rejection performance in the presence of external disturbances and model uncertainties is implemented, which is designed within the framework of the standard H∞ optimisation problem by combining a conventional mixed sensitivity and model matching problem with robust stability. The experimental and simulation results show that the both two proposed controllers satisfy all desired requirements for the stabilisation loop associated with the gain crossover frequency, the gain and phase margin and the body-motion decoupling performance. It is shown through performance comparison and analysis that the proposed H∞ controller is preferable to the proposed Lead-PI controller in terms of system stability, the disturbance rejection rate and because of its fast time response characteristics. However, it is clear that the two proposed controller design procedures for the robust control of the stabilisation loop of a two-axis gimbaled sensor system can be very effective in practical applications in terms of both stability and disturbance rejection.

[1]  H.-P. Lee Scan loop control design for a spin-stabilised seeker , 1998 .

[2]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Peter J. Kennedy,et al.  Direct versus indirect line of sight (LOS) stabilization , 2003, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  A. K. Rue Stabilization of Precision Electrooptical Pointing and Tracking Systems , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  G. Zames Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses , 1981 .

[6]  James Lam,et al.  Mixed H∞ optimisation with model-matching , 1994 .

[7]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Novel identification method from step response , 2007 .

[8]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Non‐smooth structured control design with application to PID loop‐shaping of a process , 2007 .

[9]  Taik-Dong Cho,et al.  Robust control of hydraulically operated gimbal system , 2007 .

[10]  K. Janschek,et al.  Performance analysis of opto-mechatronic image stabilization for a compact space camera , 2007 .

[11]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A magnitude and rate saturation model and its use in the solution of a static anti-windup problem , 2008, Syst. Control. Lett..

[12]  Manfred Morari,et al.  A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs , 1994, Autom..

[13]  Pedro Albertos,et al.  Tuning of a PID controlled gyro by using the bifurcation theory , 2008, Syst. Control. Lett..

[14]  Michel Malabre,et al.  Simultaneous model matching and disturbance rejection with stability by state feedback , 2003, Autom..

[15]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  An anti-windup strategy for active vibration isolation systems , 2006 .

[16]  James Lam,et al.  An application of H∞ design to model-following , 1992 .

[17]  B. Ekstrand Tracking filters and models for seeker applications , 2001 .

[18]  David A. Hullender,et al.  Adaptive control system techniques applied to inertial stabilization systems , 1990 .

[19]  B. Ekstrand Equations of motion for a two-axes gimbal system , 2001 .

[20]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H/sub 2/ and H/sub infinity / control problems , 1989 .