Controlling cell–cell interactions using surface acoustic waves

Significance We present a unique acoustic well approach that can precisely control cell-to-cell distance and cell–cell interactions. Our technology can achieve high precision and high throughput simultaneously while preserving the integrity of cells. It is capable of creating cell assemblies with precise spatial control both in suspension and on a substrate. We envision the exploitation of this powerful technology, for example, in the study of cell–cell interactions in fields, such as immunology, developmental biology, neuroscience, and cancer metastasis, and in the studies of cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion. The interactions between pairs of cells and within multicellular assemblies are critical to many biological processes such as intercellular communication, tissue and organ formation, immunological reactions, and cancer metastasis. The ability to precisely control the position of cells relative to one another and within larger cellular assemblies will enable the investigation and characterization of phenomena not currently accessible by conventional in vitro methods. We present a versatile surface acoustic wave technique that is capable of controlling the intercellular distance and spatial arrangement of cells with micrometer level resolution. This technique is, to our knowledge, among the first of its kind to marry high precision and high throughput into a single extremely versatile and wholly biocompatible technology. We demonstrated the capabilities of the system to precisely control intercellular distance, assemble cells with defined geometries, maintain cellular assemblies in suspension, and translate these suspended assemblies to adherent states, all in a contactless, biocompatible manner. As an example of the power of this system, this technology was used to quantitatively investigate the gap junctional intercellular communication in several homotypic and heterotypic populations by visualizing the transfer of fluorescent dye between cells.

[1]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[2]  K. Willecke,et al.  Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Chung Yu Chan,et al.  Probing cell-cell communication with microfluidic devices. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Bing Xu,et al.  Magnetic Nanoparticles for the Manipulation of Proteins and Cells , 2012 .

[5]  M. Bissell,et al.  Control of mammary epithelial differentiation: basement membrane induces tissue-specific gene expression in the absence of cell-cell interaction and morphological polarity , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Martyn Hill,et al.  Ultrasound assisted particle and cell manipulation on-chip. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[7]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  Walter Blondel,et al.  Advantages and limitations of commonly used methods to assay the molecular permeability of gap junctional intercellular communication. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[9]  O. Blaschuk,et al.  Deficient epithelial-fibroblast heterocellular gap junction communication can be overcome by co-culture with an intermediate cell type but not by E-cadherin transgene expression. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[10]  Ilyas M. Khan,et al.  Gap junctional intercellular communication and cytoskeletal organization in chondrocytes in suspension in an ultrasound trap , 2006, Molecular membrane biology.

[11]  A. Thor,et al.  The art and science of cytopathology: Richard M. DeMay, MD. Chicago IL, ASCP Press, 1996, 2 vol set, 1,289 pages, $285 , 1996 .

[12]  Peng Li,et al.  Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[13]  M. Nedergaard,et al.  Direct gap junction communication between malignant glioma cells and astrocytes. , 1999, Cancer research.

[14]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Spatial organization and signal transduction at intercellular junctions , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  R. Demay The art & science of cytopathology , 1996 .

[16]  R. Hoda The Art and Science of Cytopathology , 1996 .

[17]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Forthcoming Lab on a Chip tutorial series on acoustofluidics: acoustofluidics-exploiting ultrasonic standing wave forces and acoustic streaming in microfluidic systems for cell and particle manipulation. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Kuo-Kang Liu,et al.  Optical tweezers for single cells , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Giorgia Quadrato,et al.  Direct cell-cell contact with the vascular niche maintains quiescent neural stem cells , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  I-Kao Chiang,et al.  On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Voldman Electrical forces for microscale cell manipulation. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[22]  Daniel Ahmed,et al.  Acoustic tweezers: patterning cells and microparticles using standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW). , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[23]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Microfluidic-based patterning of embryonic stem cells for in vitro development studies. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[24]  M. Brownlee Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications , 2001, Nature.

[25]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton , 2010, Nature.

[26]  M. Gardel,et al.  Regulation of cell motile behavior by crosstalk between cadherin- and integrin-mediated adhesions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Thomas Frisk,et al.  Live cell imaging in a micro-array of acoustic traps facilitates quantification of natural killer cell heterogeneity. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[28]  Annie Z. Tremp Malaria: Plasmodium develops in lymph nodes , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[29]  M. Théry,et al.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[30]  Wen-hong Li,et al.  LAMP, a new imaging assay of gap junctional communication unveils that Ca2+ influx inhibits cell coupling , 2005, Nature Methods.

[31]  B. Guillotin,et al.  Effect of HUVEC on human osteoprogenitor cell differentiation needs heterotypic gap junction communication. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.