Land use, transport, and environment interactions: WCTR 2016 contributions and future research directions

Abstract Research on the interaction amongst land use, transport, and the environment has a long history and can fill volumes of publications. Such research has contributed to urban and transportation planning and substantially reduced problems in transport, land use, and the environment. However, solving traditional problems caused by the spatial disorder of land use and transportation facilities still remains an elusive goal. For instance, we can easily find that severe traffic jams and high car dependencies cause various problems in many developed cities, while extensive suburbanization driven by high mobility has led to increased energy consumption and environmental impact. Similar problems have emerged in developing countries with a greater magnitude than in developed nations. Additionally, new problems related to sustainability, including social exclusion and climate change, are in effect around the world. The progress and emergence of new technologies in transportation, the potential of travel behavior monitoring, and the sensing of the earth surface are motivating the expansion of research topics and methodologies. The World Conference on Transport Research Society (WCTRS) is one of the oldest research communities studying land use/transport interactions. This virtual special issue consists of selected and fully reviewed papers presented at the 2016 World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR) in Shanghai. In this editorial, we place these published contributions and others made during the conference in the context of the broader literature, present an assessment of the progress of research in this domain, and finally propose an agenda for future research directions in the field of transport, land use, and environmental interactions.

[1]  Tiezhu Li,et al.  The concentration distribution of exposures to particulate air pollution on different road sections , 2017 .

[2]  Takuya Togawa,et al.  Comparative Analysis of QOL in Station Areas between Cities at Different Development Stages, Bangkok and Nagoya , 2017 .

[3]  K. Seto,et al.  Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  K. Rao,et al.  Application of the concept of transit oriented development to a suburban neighborhood , 2017 .

[5]  Sudeshna Mitra,et al.  Quantifying dimensions of Transportation Diversity: A City-Based Comparative Approach , 2017 .

[6]  Wang Di The Impact of Mass Transit on Public Security - A Study of Bay Area Rapid Transit in San Francisco , 2017 .

[7]  Tatiana Filatova,et al.  A Review of Urban Residential Choice Models Using Agent-Based Modeling , 2014 .

[8]  Thomas Capelle,et al.  Calibration of the Tranus land use module: Optimisation-based algorithms, their validation, and parameter selection by statistical model selection , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[9]  Peiqin Gu,et al.  Modelling household travel energy consumption and CO2 emissions based on the spatial form of neighborhoods and streets: A case study of Jinan, China , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  Marcial Echenique Econometric Models of Land Use and Transportation , 2004 .

[11]  M. Ignaccolo,et al.  Influence of Accessibility, Land Use and Transport Policies on the Transport Energy Dependence of a City , 2017 .

[12]  Tatiana Filatova,et al.  Changing Climate, Changing Behavior: Adaptive Economic Behavior and Housing Markets Responses to Flood Risks , 2013, ESSA.

[13]  Masanobu Kii,et al.  Urban expansion using remote-sensing data and a monocentric urban model , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[14]  M. Kii,et al.  Development of a suitability model for estimation of global urban land cover , 2017 .

[15]  Tatiana Filatova,et al.  Empirical agent-based land market: Integrating adaptive economic behavior in urban land-use models , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[16]  M. André,et al.  Considering criteria related to spatial variabilities for the assessment of air pollution from traffic , 2017 .

[17]  Geoffrey Caruso,et al.  Urban compactness and the trade-off between air pollution emission and exposure: Lessons from a spatially explicit theoretical model , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  M. Wegener Overview of Land Use Transport Models , 2004 .

[19]  Mahmudur Rahman Fatmi,et al.  Type Choice Behavior of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Latent Class Model Approach , 2017 .

[20]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  ART‐P‐MAP Neural Networks Modeling of Land‐Use Change: Accounting for Spatial Heterogeneity and Uncertainty , 2015 .

[21]  Nunu Noviandi,et al.  Modeling of dynamics complexity of land use and transport in megapolitan urban fringe (case of Bekasi city) , 2017 .

[22]  Hossein Shafizadeh-Moghadam,et al.  Transition index maps for urban growth simulation: application of artificial neural networks, weight of evidence and fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation , 2017, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[23]  Kazuki Nakamura,et al.  Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction , 2016 .

[24]  Rolf Moeckel,et al.  Trends in integrated land use/transport modeling: An evaluation of the state of the art , 2018, Journal of Transport and Land Use.

[25]  Bauke de Vries,et al.  Procedural modeling of urban layout: population, land use, and road network , 2017 .

[26]  F. Webster,et al.  LAND USE AND TRANSPORT INTERACTIONS: REPORT OF THE ISGLUTI STUDY , 1991 .

[27]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2016 .

[28]  Liming Wang,et al.  Microsimulating Parcel-Level Land Use and Activity-Based Travel: Development of a Prototype Application in San Francisco , 2010 .

[29]  M. Batty The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[30]  Vilmos Oszter “Which factors play a key role in the spatial interactions between different micro regions? An empirical study based on O-D travel surveys in Hungary” , 2017 .

[31]  Sowjanya Dhulipala,et al.  Building A Neuro-Fuzzy Based Route Choice Model in Metropolitan Context: Surat City in India , 2017 .