High-order implicit residual smoothing time scheme for direct and large eddy simulations of compressible flows

Abstract Restrictions on the maximum allowable time step of explicit time integration methods for direct and large eddy simulations of compressible turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers can be very severe, because of the extremely small space steps used close to solid walls to capture tiny and elongated boundary layer structures. A way of increasing stability limits is to use implicit time integration schemes. However, the price to pay is a higher computational cost per time step, higher discretization errors and lower parallel scalability. In quest for an implicit time scheme for scale-resolving simulations providing the best possible compromise between these opposite requirements, we develop a Runge–Kutta implicit residual smoothing (IRS) scheme of fourth-order accuracy, based on a bilaplacian operator. The implicit operator involves the inversion of scalar pentadiagonal systems, for which efficient parallel algorithms are available. The proposed method is assessed against two explicit and two implicit time integration techniques in terms of computational cost required to achieve a threshold level of accuracy. Precisely, the proposed time scheme is compared to four-stages and six-stages low-storage Runge–Kutta method, to the second-order IRS and to a second-order backward scheme solved by means of matrix-free quasi-exact Newton subiterations. Numerical results show that the proposed IRS scheme leads to reductions in computational time by a factor 3 to 5 for an accuracy comparable to that of the corresponding explicit Runge–Kutta scheme.

[1]  T. Poinsot Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[2]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation on Curvilinear Grids Using Compact Differencing and Filtering Schemes , 2002 .

[3]  Luciano Andrea Catalano,et al.  Upwinding and implicit residual smoothing on cell‐vertex unstructured grids , 2005 .

[4]  R. Peyret,et al.  Three-dimensional calculation of transonic viscous flows by an implicit method , 1985 .

[5]  Robert D. Moser,et al.  A numerical study of turbulent supersonic isothermal-wall channel flow , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  A parallel implicit method for the direct numerical simulation of wall-bounded compressible turbulence , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Homer F. Walker,et al.  Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  Rob Haelterman,et al.  Optimization of the Runge-Kutta iteration with residual smoothing , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[9]  G. A. Gerolymos,et al.  Performance of very‐high‐order upwind schemes for DNS of compressible wall‐turbulence , 2009 .

[10]  Christophe Eric Corre,et al.  Low‐cost implicit schemes for all‐speed flows on unstructured meshes , 2008 .

[11]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Rodrick V. Chima,et al.  An unconditionally stable Runge-Kutta method for unsteady flows , 1989 .

[13]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Higher-order and length-scale statistics from DNS of a decelerated planar wall-bounded turbulent flow , 2015 .

[14]  P. Moin,et al.  Effects of the Computational Time Step on Numerical Solutions of Turbulent Flow , 1994 .

[15]  G. A. Gerolymos,et al.  Pressure, density, temperature and entropy fluctuations in compressible turbulent plane channel flow , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  R. Dembo,et al.  INEXACT NEWTON METHODS , 1982 .

[17]  João Luiz F. Azevedo,et al.  An assessment of unstructured grid finite volume schemes for cold gas hypersonic flow calculations , 2009 .

[18]  Per-Olof Persson,et al.  High-Order LES Simulations using Implicit-Explicit Runge-Kutta Schemes , 2011 .

[19]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Solution of the Euler equations for complex configurations , 1983 .

[20]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  A shock-capturing methodology based on adaptative spatial filtering for high-order non-linear computations , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Paola Cinnella,et al.  The high-order dynamic computational laboratory for CFD research and applications , 2013 .

[22]  E. Turkel,et al.  PRECONDITIONING TECHNIQUES IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1999 .

[23]  Alain Lerat,et al.  Spectral properties of high-order residual-based compact schemes for unsteady compressible flows , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Reynolds number effects on the Reynolds-stress budgets in turbulent channels , 2008 .

[25]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  A time‐implicit high‐order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large‐eddy simulation , 2003 .

[26]  J. Sidès,et al.  An implicit finite-volume method for solving the Euler equations , 1982 .

[27]  C. Bogey,et al.  A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations , 2004 .

[28]  R. Swanson,et al.  Multistage Schemes With Multigrid for Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[29]  Sergio Pirozzoli,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of isotropic compressible turbulence: Influence of compressibility on dynamics and structures , 2004 .

[30]  J. Lambert Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem , 1991 .

[31]  David W. Zingg,et al.  An Investigation of Directional-Coarsening and Line-Implicit Smoothing Applied to Agglomeration Multigrid , 2003 .

[32]  Ravi Samtaney,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics , 2001 .

[33]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction , 1999 .

[34]  Christophe Bailly,et al.  High-order, low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for multiple-scale and boundary problems , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[36]  Jae Wook Kim,et al.  Quasi-disjoint pentadiagonal matrix systems for the parallelization of compact finite-difference schemes and filters , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[37]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1999 .