AFFERENT RESPONSE OF A HEAD CANAL NEUROMAST OF THE RUFF (ACERINA-CERNUA) LATERAL LINE

Abstract 1. 1. The fourth neuromast of the supra-orbital canal of the ruff lateral line is innervated by 300–400 fibres. 2. 2. Afferent activity of 46 fibres was investigated as a function of stimulus amplitude and of stimulus frequency. 3. 3. The dynamic range of the fibres exceeded 30 dB. 4. 4. The gain with respect to acceleration appeared to be constant from a few Hz up to 60–80 Hz. 5. 5. At higher frequencies the gain rapidly fell off (80 dB/decade). 6. 6. Short-term (τ ≈ 100 ms) and long-term adaptation effects were observed in response to large stimulus amplitudes. 7. 7. Fibres had comparable dynamic range and sensitivity. 8. 8. Response properties at stimulus onset and offset confirmed that the neural activity encodes water acceleration in the vicinity of the fish.

[1]  Alfon B. A. Kroese,et al.  Sensory Transduction in Lateral Line Hair cells , 1989 .

[2]  V Honrubia,et al.  Neural transduction in Xenopus laevis lateral line system. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Montgomery Lateral Line Detection of Planktonic Prey , 1989 .

[4]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  The coding of sound pressure and frequency in cochlear hair cells of the terrapin , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Fessard,et al.  Electroreceptors and Other Specialized Receptors in Lower Vertrebrates , 1974, Handbook of Sensory Physiology.

[6]  Peripheral Processing by the Lateral Line System of the Mottled Sculpin ( Cottus bairdi ) , 1989 .

[7]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Field Detection , 1988 .

[8]  A. J. Hudspeth,et al.  Stereocilia mediate transduction in vertebrate hair cells , 1979 .

[9]  G. Harris,et al.  Input-output characteristics of the lateral-line sense organs of Xenopus laevis. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Sietse M. van Netten,et al.  Laser interferometric measurements on the dynamic behaviour of the cupula in the fish lateral line , 1987, Hearing Research.

[11]  T. Furukawa Sound reception and synaptic transmission in goldfish hair cells. , 1986, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[12]  S. Dijkgraaf THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  Jan Willem Kuiper,et al.  The microphonic effect of the lateral line organ: A study on the biophysics and the function of the lateral line organ of Acernina cernua L. , 1956 .

[14]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Amphibian Lateral Line Receptors , 1976 .

[15]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  A. Flock,et al.  ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE LATERAL LINE CANAL ORGAN. , 1964, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[17]  Olav Sand,et al.  The Lateral Line and Sound Reception , 1981 .

[18]  P. Gray Conditional probability analyses of the spike activity of single neurons. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[19]  E. Schwartz Lateral-Line Mechano-Receptors in Fishes and Amphibians , 1974 .

[20]  R. Oswald Injection anaesthesia for experimental studies in fish. , 1978, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. C: Comparative pharmacology.

[21]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY OF INDIVIDUAL VERTEBRATE HAIR CELLS TO CONTROLLED DEFLECTION OF THEIR HAIR BUNDLES * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[23]  S. V. Netten,et al.  Dynamic Behavior and Micromechanical Properties of the Cupula , 1989 .

[24]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Functional Evolution of Lateral Line and Inner Ear Sensory Systems , 1989 .

[25]  H. Münz,et al.  Functional Organization of the Lateral Line Periphery , 1989 .

[26]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[27]  Gerard G. Harris,et al.  Evidence that the Lateral‐Line Organ Responds to Near‐Field Displacements of Sound Sources in Water , 1962 .

[28]  N A Schellart,et al.  Velocity- and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  A. Palmer,et al.  Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells , 1986, Hearing Research.

[30]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. V. van Netten,et al.  The application of incident light polarization microscopy for the visualization of vertebrate sensory hair cells in vivo. , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[32]  J. Wersäll,et al.  A STUDY OF THE ORIENTATION OF THE SENSORY HAIRS OF THE RECEPTOR CELLS IN THE LATERAL LINE ORGAN OF FISH, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE FUNCTION OF THE RECEPTORS , 1962, The Journal of cell biology.