L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization*

The finding that speakers of aspect languages encode event endpoints to a lesser extent than do speakers of non-aspect languages has led to the hypothesis that there is a relationship between grammatical aspect and event conceptualization (e.g., von Stutterheim and Nüse, 2003). The present study concerns L1 event conceptualization in 40 L1 Spanish – L2 Swedish bilinguals (all near-native speakers of Swedish). Spanish and Swedish differ as regards grammatical aspect: whereas Swedish lacks this grammatical category, Spanish conveys aspect through verbal morphology and periphrasis. The principal aim of the study was to explore the relationship between productive event conceptualization patterns and receptive decoding proficiency related to aspectual contrasts. The participants were asked to provide oral L1 Spanish descriptions of video clips projecting motion events with different degrees of endpoint orientation (see von Stutterheim, 2003). In addition, they took a grammaticality judgment test concerning verb and gender agreement, verbal clitics and aspectual contrasts. Compared with baseline data from monolingual Spanish speakers, the results on endpoint encoding show that the bilinguals mention the endpoints of motion events to a higher degree than the Spanish control group does. Moreover, it was shown that the weaker the bilinguals' discrimination of aspectual errors on the grammaticality judgment test, the more prone they were to encoding endpoints. This result consequently furthers the hypothesis about the interconnectedness between grammatical aspect and event conceptualization. The results were further interpreted as indicating that the bilinguals are influenced by the Swedish-like tendency to attend to the boundedness rather than the ongoingness of events.

[1]  Hubert Cuyckens,et al.  Introducing Cognitive Linguistics , 2010 .

[2]  Hubert Cuyckens,et al.  The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics , 2010 .

[3]  Monika S. Schmid,et al.  The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting* , 2009, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[4]  Emanuel Bylund,et al.  Maturational Constraints and First Language Attrition , 2009 .

[5]  Emanuel Bylund,et al.  Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns* , 2009, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[6]  Kenneth Hyltenstam,et al.  Age of Onset and Nativelikeness in a Second Language: Listener Perception Versus Linguistic Scrutiny , 2009 .

[7]  Panos Athanasopoulos,et al.  Cognitive representation of colour in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues* , 2009, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[8]  Marianne Gullberg,et al.  BIDIRECTIONAL CROSSLINGUISTIC INFLUENCE IN L1-L2 ENCODING OF MANNER IN SPEECH AND GESTURE: A Study of Japanese Speakers of English , 2008, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Terence Odlin,et al.  CONCEPTUAL TRANSFER AND MEANING EXTENSIONS , 2008 .

[10]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[11]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[12]  Emanuel Bylund Procesos de conceptualización de eventos en español y en sueco: Diferencias translingüísticas , 2008 .

[13]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition , 2007 .

[14]  M. Paradis L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism , 2007 .

[15]  Monika S. Schmid,et al.  Language attrition : theoretical perspectives , 2007 .

[16]  Panos Athanasopoulos,et al.  Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction , 2007 .

[17]  René Dirven,et al.  Cognitive English Grammar , 2007 .

[18]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Theoretical and Methodological Issues in the Investigation of Conceptual Transfer , 2007 .

[19]  Jill Hohenstein,et al.  Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults , 2006 .

[20]  Christopher Habel,et al.  Multidisciplinary approaches to language production , 2004 .

[21]  Ayşe Gürel,et al.  Selectivity in L2-induced L1 attrition: a psycholinguistic account , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[22]  R. Cheloha,et al.  The of a Development , 2004 .

[23]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: a study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish , 2004 .

[24]  M. Carroll,,et al.  The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach , 2004 .

[25]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[26]  Christiane von Stutterheim,et al.  Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal , 2003 .

[27]  Christiane von Stutterheim Linguistic structure and information organisation: The case of very advanced learners , 2003 .

[28]  C. Graumann,et al.  Perspective and perspectivation in discourse , 2002 .

[29]  W. Klein,et al.  Quaestio and L-perspectivation , 2002 .

[30]  Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen,et al.  Information Structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective , 2002 .

[31]  Christiane von Stutterheim,et al.  Typology and information organisation: perspective taking and Language-specific effects in the construal of events , 2002 .

[32]  Anna Giacalone Ramat,et al.  Typology and Second Language Acquisition , 2002 .

[33]  Christiane von Stutterheim,et al.  Cross-linguistic differences in the conceptualisation of events , 2002 .

[34]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Pronunciation Proficiency in the First and Second Languages of Korean-English Bilinguals. , 2000 .

[35]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Time in language. , 2000 .

[36]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Grammar and conceptualization , 1999 .

[37]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[38]  B. Meek Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1998 .

[39]  Jukka Havu La constituciÓn temporal del sintagma verbal en el español moderno , 1998 .

[40]  D. Slobin From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[41]  K. Bot,et al.  A 16‐year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia , 1994 .

[42]  Roy C. Major Progression & regression in language: Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology , 1994 .

[43]  Kenneth Hyltenstam,et al.  Progression & regression in language : sociocultural, neuropsychological, & linguistic perspectives , 1994 .

[44]  Clive Perdue,et al.  Adult language acquisition : cross-linguistic perspectives , 1993 .

[45]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition: References , 1992 .

[46]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Some Properties of Bilingual Maintenance and Loss in Mexican Background High-School Students , 1992 .

[47]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  First language attrition: Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition , 1991 .

[48]  K. Bot,et al.  First language attrition: L1 loss in an L2 environment: Dutch immigrants in France , 1991 .

[49]  P. V. Buren,et al.  First language attrition: First language attrition and the parameter setting model , 1991 .

[50]  Robert M. Vago,et al.  First language attrition: Frontmatter , 1991 .

[51]  D. Slobin Learning To Think For Speaking: Native Language, Cognition, And Rhetorical Style , 1991 .

[52]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar” , 1988 .

[53]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[54]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[55]  Richard D. Lambert,et al.  The Loss of language skills , 1982 .

[56]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[57]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems@@@On Aspect Theory and Homeric Aspect , 1978 .