Have traditional career paths given way to protean ones?: Evidence from senior managers in the Australian public sector

Purpose – This mixed-method study aims to determine the extent to which the career paths of senior managers conform with the traditional versus protean elements described in the careers literature and whether these paths vary by gender. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 15 senior managers (seven women and eight men) in a large public sector agency in Australia were interviewed about their career trajectories to date. Data were coded according to four major areas which characterise and distinguish between traditional and protean careers: development, orientation of the employee, definition of success, and organisational environment. A total of 81 managers (34 women and 47 men) from the same organisation were also surveyed. Variables of interest were those that could be triangulated with qualitative data such as the availability of career opportunities. Findings – Results suggest that, contrary to much existing literature which proposes that all careers have been fundamentally altered, the traditional career which relies on length of service, geographic mobility and a steady climb up the corporate ladder, is still the dominant model in some organisations. However, the trend towards protean careers is evident and is more pronounced for women than for men. Research limitations/implications – The specific nature of the organisation (large, male-dominated, public sector) may limit the generalisability of results. Practical implications – The framework used to explore career paths according to traditional/ protean elements in this study may assist human resource practitioners to develop appropriate strategies which maximise the professional development of employees. Originality/value – The results of this research challenge the universality of change in the nature of careers, particularly in public sector environments.

[1]  D. Hall,et al.  The New Career Contract: Developing the Whole Person at Midlife and Beyond , 1995 .

[2]  Rosemary Hunter,et al.  Indirect Discrimination in the Workplace , 1992 .

[3]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[4]  Susan Walsh Sanderson,et al.  Geographic Constraints on Married Women's Careers , 1987 .

[5]  Julia Evetts,et al.  Sociological aspects of women in primary teaching : career contexts and strategies , 1991 .

[6]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Gender Differences in Managers' Developmental Job Experiences , 1994 .

[7]  Jean Woodall,et al.  Lost opportunities? Organisational restructuring and women managers , 1999 .

[8]  D. Hall,et al.  The new protean career contract: Helping organizations and employees adapt , 1998 .

[9]  Heather Maguire,et al.  Psychological contracts: are they still relevant? , 2002 .

[10]  Joy A. Schneer,et al.  The promised path:a longitudinal study of managerial careers , 2003 .

[11]  K. S. Lyness,et al.  Climbing the corporate ladder: do female and male executives follow the same route? , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Carol Tavris,et al.  The queen bee syndrome , 1974 .

[13]  Kimberly S. McDonald,et al.  Career Aspirations of Non-Managerial Women: Adjustment and Adaptation , 2003 .

[14]  Roger Cox,et al.  Women returning to higher education , 1993 .

[15]  Ruth Simpson,et al.  Gender mix and organisational fit: how gender imbalance at different levels of the organisation impacts on women managers , 2000 .

[16]  Wayne M. Wormley,et al.  Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes , 1990 .

[17]  Kimberly S. McDonald,et al.  HRD Initiatives Contributing to Women's Career Progress , 1999 .

[18]  Kimberly S. McDonald,et al.  Gender issues in management development: implications and research agenda , 1995 .

[19]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Family Structure, Glass Ceiling, and Traditional Explanations for the Differential Rate of Turnover of Female and Male Managers , 1996 .

[20]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Men's and Women's Definitions of “Good” Jobs , 1998 .

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  Phyllis Tharenou,et al.  Men and Women Managers' Advancement: Personal or Situational Determinants? , 1994 .

[23]  D. Hall Protean Careers of the 21st Century , 1996 .

[24]  Ruth E. Fassinger,et al.  Persistence, Connection, and Passion: A Qualitative Study of the Career Development of Highly Achieving African American-Black and White Women. , 1997 .

[25]  H. Wilensky Work, careers and social integration. , 1960 .

[26]  J. Oakley,et al.  Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs , 2000 .

[27]  Julia Evetts,et al.  Women in Banking Careers—a Science of Muddling Through? , 2000 .

[28]  D. Hall The protean career: A quarter-century journey , 2004 .

[29]  Belle Rose Ragins,et al.  Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling , 1998 .

[30]  Gill Palmer,et al.  Book Reviews : Employment Relations: Industrial Relations and Human Resource Management in Australia , 1991 .

[31]  Jennifer Rindfleish,et al.  Senior management women in Australia: diverse perspectives , 2000 .

[32]  Patrice Rosenthal,et al.  Gender differences in managers′ attributions for successful work performance , 1995 .

[33]  Catherine A. Hansman Mentoring and Women's Career Development , 1998 .

[34]  S. Sullivan The Changing Nature of Careers: A Review and Research Agenda , 1999 .

[35]  Mary Dean Lee,et al.  Alternative work arrangements among professionals and managers: Rethinking career development and success , 2001 .

[36]  Leonie Still,et al.  Career barriers and the older woman manager , 1998 .