Does multimedia support individual differences? – EFL learners’ listening comprehension and cognitive load

The present study examines how display model, English proficiency and cognitive preference affect English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ listening comprehension of authentic videos and cognitive load degree. EFL learners were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The control group received single coding and the experimental group received dual coding. The results show that the display model affects EFL learners’ cognitive load and listening comprehension of CNN news. There is no interaction among English proficiency, cognitive preference and experimental conditions on the listening comprehension scores and cognitive load scale. Learners with a low aptitude for visual learning had poorer performance and a higher cognitive load than those with a high aptitude for visual learning. All learners, regardless of cognitive styles and level of English, benefited from dual coding. The dual-code display model thus seems to be effective in reducing EFL learners’ cognitive load.

[1]  Khalid Al-Seghayer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MULTIMEDIA ANNOTATION MODES ON L2 VOCABULARY ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2001 .

[2]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The role of spatial descriptions in learning from multimedia , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Patrick R. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive styles and instructional design in university learning , 2010 .

[4]  Michael Rost,et al.  Listening in Language Learning , 1990 .

[5]  Robert Vanderplank,et al.  The value of teletext sub-titles in language learning , 1988 .

[6]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition , 1996 .

[7]  Linda Blake,et al.  The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[9]  Linda Jones,et al.  TESTING L2 VOCABULARY RECOGNITION AND RECALL USING PICTORIAL AND WRITTEN TEST ITEMS , 2004 .

[10]  Thomas J. Garza,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Captioned Video Materials in Advanced Foreign Language Learning , 1991 .

[11]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Multimodal Versus Unimodal Instruction in a Complex Learning Context , 2002 .

[12]  R. Moreno,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories , 2010 .

[13]  Makoto Yoshii,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY RETENTION: THE EFFECT OF TEXT AND PICTURE ANNOTATION TYPES , 2013 .

[14]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Techniques That Reduce Extraneous Cognitive Load and Manage Intrinsic Cognitive Load during Multimedia Learning , 2010 .

[15]  Esther Thorson,et al.  How Verbalizers and Visualizers Process the Newspaper Environment , 2004 .

[16]  Hui-Yu Yang,et al.  Does multimedia support individual differences? – EFL learners’ listening comprehension and cognitive load , 2014 .

[17]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching , 2001 .

[19]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations - Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[21]  J. Plass,et al.  Supporting Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition in French with Multimedia Annotations , 2002 .

[22]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[23]  Linda C. Jones.  Supporting Student Differences in Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning with Multimedia Annotations. , 2013 .

[24]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behavior in authentic learning situations: The Visualizer/Verbalizer Behavior Observation Scale (VV-BOS). , 1998 .

[25]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Fred Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Measuring Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[27]  Holger Horz,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load in Learning with Multiple Representations , 2010 .

[28]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND CONTENT REPRESENTATION TYPE ON MOBILE LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2008 .

[29]  Gunther A. Mueller,et al.  Visual Contextual Cues and Listening Comprehension: An Experiment , 1980 .

[30]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning: Segmenting, Pre-training, and Modality Principles , 2005 .

[31]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Techniques That Increase Generative Processing in Multimedia Learning: Open Questions for Cognitive Load Research , 2010 .

[32]  Inigo Yanguas,et al.  Multimedia Glosses and Their Effect on L2 Text Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning , 2009 .

[33]  Joana Acha,et al.  The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children's vocabulary learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..