Empirical Studies of Functional Decomposition in Early Design

This paper explores functional decomposition in early design. In the first part of this study, we explore how the three most common methods (top-down, energy-flow, enumeration) affect concept generation for novice design teams (n=25). We found that nearly all the features in the final concept could be mapped to the function diagram, though not all the functions mapped to the actual concept. This suggests that there is not much change in system functionality between these two phases, despite being separated by a few weeks. We also found that teams who used top-down and energy-flow performed nearly the same, and teams who used enumeration performed worse than those who used energy-flow. Based on these results, we recommend using either top-down or energy-flow, but not enumeration in early design. We also observed that teams used the diagramming process to reach a consensus and support team communication. The second part of this study evaluates design reports (n=78) from industry engineers taking a distance learning design course. Even though roughly half of the reports used functional decomposition, there was no correlation between using functional decomposition and final design quality as measured by various grade components. We also observed that half of the function diagrams were tree diagrams. This supports prior findings that a top-down, tree-based approach is more intuitive for engineers. Together, these results suggest that functional decomposition is helpful for team communication, but show no direct correlation with design outcome. We also recommend training strategies for teaching decomposition based on differences between the two datasets.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[2]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Functional Reasoning in Design , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[3]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[4]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Evaluating the Bottom-Up Method for Functional Decomposition in Product Dissection Tasks , 2014 .

[5]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Comparing Functional Analysis Methods for Product Dissection Tasks , 2015 .

[6]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[7]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  A case for multiple views of function in design based on a common definition , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Physical Models and Design Thinking: A Study of Functionality, Novelty and Variety of Ideas. , 2012 .

[9]  Erik Kaestner,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 2016 .

[10]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  An Investigation Into the Effectiveness of an Algorithmic Approach to Teaching Functional Modeling , 2013 .

[11]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  The function analysis diagram: Intended benefits and coexistence with other functional models , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[12]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[13]  Hans Schmekel,et al.  Functional Models and Design Solutions , 1989 .

[14]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  The coexistence of engineering meanings of function: Four responses and their methodological implications , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[15]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  The Effects of Language and Pruning on Function Structure Interpretability , 2012 .

[16]  Henry W. Stoll.  Product design methods and practices , 1999 .

[17]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Directing idea generation using brainstorming with specific novelty goals , 2011 .

[18]  Shraddha Sangelkar,et al.  Adapting ADA Architectural Design Knowledge for Universal Product Design Using Association Rule Mining: A Function Based Approach , 2012 .

[19]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  Mitigating Design Fixation Effects in Engineering Design Through Product Dissection Activities , 2014 .

[20]  George Ellwood Dieter,et al.  Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach , 1983 .

[21]  Michael Joseph French,et al.  Conceptual Design for Engineers , 1985 .

[22]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Development of a Functional Basis for Design , 2000 .

[23]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[24]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  A Tablet Based Application for Teaching Function and Exploring Concept Alternatives During Early Design , 2012 .

[25]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[26]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design Concepts: Theory, applications, and emerging research issues , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[27]  Edward B. Magrab,et al.  Integrated product and process design and development : the product realization process , 2009 .

[28]  W. P. Lewis,et al.  Fundamentals of Engineering Design , 1989 .

[29]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[30]  Gregory M. Mocko,et al.  Assessing the Use of Function Models and Interaction Models Through Concept Sketching , 2012 .

[31]  Carl J. Huberty,et al.  Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses , 1998 .

[32]  Albert Albers,et al.  Different notions of function: results from an experiment on the analysis of an existing product , 2011 .

[33]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Making function modeling practically usable , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[34]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  That which is not form: The practical challenges in using functional concepts in design , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[35]  Albert Albers,et al.  Variations in functional decomposition for an existing product: Experimental results , 2011, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[36]  Patrick Little,et al.  Engineering Design: A Project Based Introduction , 1999 .

[37]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[38]  Dingmar van Eck,et al.  Supporting design knowledge exchange by converting models of functional decomposition , 2011 .