Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Mexia,et al. Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .
[2] Manuel Perea,et al. Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: Evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors , 2008, Brain and Language.
[3] T. R. Jordan,et al. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance. , 2008, Neuropsychology.
[4] A. Ellis,et al. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[5] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Word Length and Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2002, Brain and Language.
[6] Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al. Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemisphere disconnection , 1969 .
[7] T. M. Ellison,et al. Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. , 2000, Psychological review.
[8] T. R. Jordan,et al. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: Effects of word length , 2009, Cortex.
[9] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1988, Brain and Language.
[10] A. Dale,et al. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.
[12] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception , 2004, Brain and Language.
[13] D B Boles,et al. Dissociated imageability, concreteness, and familiarity in lateralized word recognition , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[14] Michal Lavidor,et al. Case alternation and length effects in lateralized word recognition: Studies of English and Hebrew , 2002, Brain and Cognition.
[15] Marc Brysbaert,et al. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: What do the data say? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[16] Michal Lavidor,et al. The nature of foveal representation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[17] The Vertical Field Border in Hemianopia and Its Significance for Fixation and Reading , 2005 .
[18] A. Jacobs,et al. Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. , 1992 .
[19] Richard J. Davidson,et al. The asymmetrical brain , 2003 .
[20] T. R. Jordan,et al. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: Effects of word length during monocular viewing , 2010, Cortex.
[21] Sharon M. Thomas,et al. Asymmetries and Eccentricities in Studies of Lateralised Word Recognition: A Response to Nazir , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[22] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Foveal Word Reading Requires Interhemispheric Communication , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] Michael C. Corballis,et al. Role of the forebrain commissures in interhemispheric integration. , 1993 .
[24] A. Leventhal,et al. The nasotemporal division in primate retina: the neural bases of macular sparing and splitting. , 1988, Science.
[25] Carol Whitney,et al. SERIOL Reading , 2008 .
[26] A. H. Bunt,et al. Foveal sparing. New anatomical evidence for bilateral representation of the central retina. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.
[27] M. Arguin,et al. Case alternation and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1999 .
[28] Padraic Monaghan,et al. Hemispheric dissociation and dyslexia in a computational model of reading , 2008, Brain and Language.
[29] Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al. Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient , 1989, Neuropsychologia.
[30] T. R. Jordan,et al. Assessing effects of fixation demands on perception of lateralized words: A visual window technique for studying hemispheric asymmetry , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[31] Marie T. Banich,et al. Interaction between the hemispheres and its implications for the processing capacity of the brain. , 2003 .
[32] J. Stone,et al. The naso‐temporal division of the monkey's retina , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[33] M. Gazzaniga. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[34] Haruki Abe,et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in homonymous hemianopsia. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.
[35] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[36] Charles Hulme,et al. The science of reading: A handbook. , 2005 .
[37] Eran Zaidel,et al. Language in the Right Hemisphere Following Callosal Disconnection , 1998 .
[38] J. Hellige,et al. Hemispheric asymmetry for word naming: effects of frequency and regularity of pronunciation. , 1998, Laterality.
[39] D. D. Wheeler. Processes in word recognition , 1970 .
[40] M S Gazzaniga,et al. Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[41] M. Gazzaniga,et al. Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: Investigations with a callosotomy patient , 1996, Neuropsychologia.
[42] T R Jordan,et al. Lateralized word recognition: assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in the Right but Not in the Left Cerebral Hemisphere , 2002, Brain and Language.
[44] Ellen Bialystok,et al. Handbook of Neurolinguistics , 1998 .
[45] A. Huber. Homonymous hemianopia after occipital lobectomy. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.
[46] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Interhemispheric cooperation and non-cooperation during word recognition: Evidence for callosal transfer dysfunction in dyslexic adults , 2007, Brain and Language.
[47] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[48] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[49] A. Ellis. Communication between the cerebral hemispheres in dyslexic and skilled adult readers , 2009 .
[50] R. Bruyer,et al. Lateral differences in lexical access: Word length vs. stimulus length , 1989, Brain and Language.
[51] M Lavidor,et al. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[52] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation , 2004, Brain and Language.
[53] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.
[54] C. Whitney. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[55] A. Young,et al. Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields , 1985, Brain and Language.
[56] Alan Cowey,et al. The 30th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Fact, Artefact, and Myth about Blindsight , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[57] S. Trauzettel-Klosinski,et al. Nasotemporal overlap of retinal ganglion cells in humans: a functional study. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[58] Daniel N. Bub,et al. Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields , 1988, Brain and Language.
[59] Timothy R. Jordan,et al. Central Fixations are Inadequately Controlled by Instructions Alone: Implications for Studying Cerebral Asymmetry , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[60] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Theoretical analysis of interhemispheric transfer costs in visual word recognition , 2008 .
[61] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[62] Janet Hui-wen Hsiao,et al. Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: Evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[63] R. Shillcock,et al. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: Effects of orthographic neighborhood size , 2004, Brain and Language.
[64] Zoë R. Hunter,et al. Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[65] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .
[66] A. Leff. A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing , 2004, Brain and Language.
[67] E. Ringelstein,et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[68] Andrew W. Ellis,et al. Mixed-case effects in lateralized word recognition , 2001, Brain and Cognition.
[69] M. Nicholls,et al. Cortical Representation of the Fovea: Implications for Visual Half-Field Research , 2003, Cortex.
[70] T. R. Jordan,et al. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[71] J. Coney. Word frequency and the lateralization of lexical processes , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[72] Michael C. Corballis,et al. Visual integration in the split brain , 1995, Neuropsychologia.
[73] A. H. Bunt,et al. Demonstration of bilateral projection of the central retina of the monkey with horseradish peroxidase neuronography , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[74] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Visual constraints in written word recognition: evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect , 2005 .
[75] Stephen J. Lupker,et al. Visual Word Recognition: Theories and Findings , 2008 .
[76] R W Schvaneveldt,et al. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.
[77] Marco Iacoboni,et al. Hemispheric Independence in Word Recognition: Evidence from Unilateral and Bilateral Presentations , 1996, Brain and Language.