Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study

Objectives: To establish: (1) inter-rater and test–retest reliability of standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer upper limb section, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test in patients with paresis secondary to stroke, multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury and (2) correlation between these arm motor scales and more general measures of impairment and activity limitation. Design: Multicentre cohort study. Setting: Three European referral centres for neurorehabilitation. Subjects: Thirty-seven stroke, 14 multiple sclerosis and five traumatic brain injury patients. Main measures: Scores of the Fugl-Meyer Test (arm section), Action Research Arm Test, and Box and Block Test derived from video information. Results: All three motor tests showed very high inter-rater and test–retest reliability (ICC and rho for main variables>0.95). Correlation between the motor scales was very high (rho>0.92). Motor scales correlated moderately highly with the Hemispheric Stroke Scale, a measure of impairment (rho=0.660–0.689), but not with the Modified Barthel Index, a measure of the ability to cope with basic activities of daily living (rho=0.044–0.086). Conclusions: The standardized guidelines assured comparability of test administration and scoring across clinical facilities. The arm motor scales provided information that was not identical to information from the Hemispheric Stroke Scale or the Modified Barthel Index. Address for correspondence: Priv.-Doz. Dr T Platz, Klinik Berlin, Kladower Damm 223, 14089 Berlin, Germany.

[1]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[2]  D. Carroll,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE TEST OF UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION. , 1965, Journal of chronic diseases.

[3]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. , 1980, European neurology.

[5]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[7]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[8]  W. Weerdt Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: A comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test , 1985 .

[9]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[10]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[11]  J. Grotta,et al.  Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. , 1987, Stroke.

[12]  H. Levin,et al.  The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  Treatment protocols. , 1990, The New Zealand medical journal.

[15]  R A Deyo,et al.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. , 1991, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  G Bravo,et al.  Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[18]  R. Hébert,et al.  Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. , 1998, Age and ageing.

[20]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  E. Svensson Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  D. Bonett Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .