Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil

Abstract Application of biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HTC) in soils is being increasingly discussed as a means to sequestrate carbon and improve chemical and physical properties for plant growth. Especially the impact on physical properties is not well investigated so far. We study the impacts of biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HTC) on water retention characteristics (WRC) as well as on the wettability of sandy soils, using lab and field studies. Sandy soils with different amounts of organic matter were mixed with BC z (feedstock maize) and HTC (feedstock maize silage). Added amounts were 1, 2.5, and 5 wt.%, respectively. The mixtures were packed in 100 cm 3 soil columns. In a field campaign identical amounts of BC f (feedstock beechwood) were added to the soil. Six months after incorporation undisturbed soil samples were taken. For these field samples available water capacity (AWC) was determined. For the packed soil columns the WRC was measured in the pressure head range from saturation to wilting point (− 15,848 cm). The extent of water repellency was determined for all samples using the water drop penetration time test. Addition of biochar leads to a decrease in bulk density, an increase in total pore volume as well as an increase in water content at the permanent wilting point. An increase in AWC could be observed for all sandy substrates used, except for the highly humic sand. Notable differences in the effects on the AWC could be measured among the three chars used. Particle size distribution of the chars as well as their consistency had different impacts on the pore size distribution of the soil matrix. No direct impact of the chars on the wettability of the soils could be observed. Local spots with hydrophobic character were detected among the samples with hydrochar, attributed to fungal colonisation.

[1]  K. Chan Development of Seasonal Water Repellence under Direct Drilling , 1992 .

[2]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[3]  M. Antonietti,et al.  Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: Effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza , 2010 .

[4]  F. Lang,et al.  Hydrophobicity of soil colloids and heavy metal mobilization: effects of drying. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[5]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Back in the black: hydrothermal carbonization of plant material as an efficient chemical process to treat the CO2 problem? , 2007 .

[6]  Louis W. Dekker,et al.  Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to the Netherlands , 1990 .

[7]  R. Graham,et al.  Physical and Chemical Properties of Pinus ponderosa Charcoal: Implications for Soil Modification , 2012 .

[8]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  A Direct Synthesis of Mesoporous Carbons with Bicontinuous Pore Morphology from Crude Plant Material by Hydrothermal Carbonization , 2007 .

[9]  Mark H. Engelhard,et al.  Oxidation of Black Carbon by Biotic and Abiotic Processes , 2006 .

[10]  B. Madari,et al.  Transpiration response of upland rice to water deficit changed by different levels of eucalyptus biochar , 2012 .

[11]  B. Xing,et al.  Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Johannes Lehmann,et al.  Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[13]  Bernd Huwe,et al.  Short‐term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions , 2012 .

[14]  Zichen Wang,et al.  The preparation and mechanism studies of rice husk based porous carbon , 2002 .

[15]  D. E. Evans,et al.  Influence of Pecan Biochar on Physical Properties of a Norfolk Loamy Sand , 2010 .

[16]  G. Wessolek,et al.  Determination of repellency distribution using soil organic matter and water content , 2005 .

[17]  A. M. Voloshchuk,et al.  The mechanism of the adsorption of water molecules on carbon adsorbents , 1995 .

[18]  T. Mattila,et al.  Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity – Results from a short-term pilot field study , 2011 .

[19]  M. Rillig,et al.  Divergent consequences of hydrochar in the plant-soil system: Arbuscular mycorrhiza, nodulation, plant growth and soil aggregation effects , 2012 .

[20]  W. Durner Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure , 1994 .

[21]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Chemistry and materials options of sustainable carbon materials made by hydrothermal carbonization. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[22]  S. Sohi BIOCHAR, CLIMATE CHANGE AND SOIL: A REVIEW TO GUIDE FUTURE RESEARCH , 2009 .

[23]  J. Lehmann Bio-energy in the black , 2007 .

[24]  Johannes Lehmann,et al.  Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions , 2007, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[25]  Yasuyuki Okimori,et al.  Carbon Sequestration by Carbonization of Biomass and Forestation: Three Case Studies , 2006 .

[26]  Andre Peters,et al.  A simple model for describing hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated porous media accounting for film and capillary flow , 2008 .

[27]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity , 2009 .

[28]  F. Scheffer,et al.  Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde , 1971, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde und Pflanzenschutz.

[29]  Andre Peters,et al.  Improved estimation of soil water retention characteristics from hydrostatic column experiments , 2006 .

[30]  R. Shakesby,et al.  Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance , 2000 .

[31]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal – a review , 2002, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[32]  H. Koch,et al.  Sugar beet ( L.) growth reduction caused by hydrochar is related to nitrogen supply. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[33]  M. Nimlos,et al.  Real-Time and Post-reaction Microscopic Structural Analysis of Biomass Undergoing Pyrolysis , 2009 .

[34]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[35]  J. Skjemstad,et al.  Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils , 2006 .

[36]  A. E. Ajayi,et al.  Effects of charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana , 2008 .

[37]  M. Ahmedna,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF DESIGNER BIOCHAR PRODUCED AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON A LOAMY SAND , 2009 .

[38]  Michael J. Gundale,et al.  Temperature and source material influence ecological attributes of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir charcoal , 2006 .

[39]  D. Laird,et al.  Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil , 2010 .

[40]  John L Gaunt,et al.  Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[42]  E. H. Tryon,et al.  Effect of Charcoal on Certain Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Forest Soils , 1948 .

[43]  M. Hajaligol,et al.  Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin , 2004 .

[44]  J. Laine,et al.  PREPARATION OF ACTIVATED CARBON FROM COCONUT SHELL IN A SMALL SCALE COCURRENT FLOW ROTARY KILN , 1991 .

[45]  P. King Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement. , 1981 .

[46]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Structural Characterization of Hydrothermal Carbon Spheres by Advanced Solid-State MAS C-13 NMR Investigations , 2009 .

[47]  K. Zygourakis,et al.  Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures , 2012 .

[48]  M. Rillig A connection between fungal hydrophobins and soil water repellency , 2005 .