Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND Patients with diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk for infection following foot and ankle surgery. This study aimed to determine whether patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus have an increased rate of infection following foot and ankle surgery compared with a cohort of patients without diabetes. Furthermore, our study sought to demonstrate whether patients with complicated diabetes are at greater risk of postoperative wound infection than are patients with uncomplicated diabetes or patients without diabetes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of 1000 patients who had orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. The following data were extracted: patient age, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, development of postoperative infection, severity of infection, inpatient or outpatient surgery, use of internal or external fixation, tobacco use, history of organ transplantation, history of rheumatoid arthritis, length of surgery, follow-up time in weeks, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS The overall infection rate in this study was 4.8%. Fifty-two percent of all infections occurred in our diabetic study group, which represented only 19% of the patient population. Postoperative infections occurred in significantly more persons with diabetes (13.2%) than in those without diabetes (2.8%). Diabetic patients were five times more likely to experience a severe infection requiring hospitalization compared with patients without diabetes. After removing the patients with neuropathy from the analysis, there was no longer a significant association between diabetes and infection. The presence of complicated diabetes increased the risk of postoperative infection by a factor of ten compared with the risk for patients without diabetes and by a factor of six compared with the risk for patients with uncomplicated diabetes. We did not identify a significantly increased risk of infection in patients with uncomplicated diabetes compared with that in patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of severe infection compared with those without diabetes. Patients with uncomplicated diabetes did not have an increased risk of postoperative infection compared with patients without diabetes, whereas patients with complicated diabetes had a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection.

[1]  W. Miller Postoperative Wound Infection in Foot and Ankle Surgery , 1983, Foot & ankle.

[2]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  S. Rith-Najarian,et al.  Identifying Diabetic Patients at High Risk for Lower-Extremity Amputation in a Primary Health Care Setting: A prospective evaluation of simple screening criteria , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[4]  R. Young,et al.  The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population‐based Study , 1994, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[5]  D G Smith,et al.  The Independent Contributions of Diabetic Neuropathy and Yasculopatny in Foot Ulceration: How great are the risks? , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[6]  R. D. McCormick,et al.  Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part II. Recommendations for the prevention of nosocomial intravascular device-related infections. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1996, American journal of infection control.

[7]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Is prophylactic diabetic foot surgery dangerous? , 1996, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[8]  A. Adler,et al.  Risk Factors for Diabetic Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy: Results of the Seattle Prospective Diabetic Foot Study , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[9]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  J. Sferra,et al.  Foot and ankle infections after surgery. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Griffiths,et al.  The North‐West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community‐based patient cohort , 2002, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[13]  Hude Quan,et al.  Validity of Information on Comorbidity Derived From ICD-9-CCM Administrative Data , 2002, Medical care.

[14]  Peripheral Arterial Disease in People With Diabetes , 2003 .

[15]  R. Thomas,et al.  Ankle Arthritis , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  R. Hoyt,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes: response to consensus statement. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[17]  A. Catanzariti,et al.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with retrograde intramedullary nailing. , 2004, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[18]  Juan C. Garbalosa,et al.  The efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in elective foot and ankle surgery. , 2004, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[19]  Dan Ziegler,et al.  Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[20]  E. Trepman,et al.  Current Topics Review: Charcot Neuroarthropathy of the Foot and Ankle , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[21]  M. Botte,et al.  Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  M. Pinzur,et al.  Ankle Arthrodesis with a Retrograde Femoral Nail for Charcot Ankle Arthropathy , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  E. Trepman,et al.  Guidelines for Diabetic Foot Care: Recommendations Endorsed by the Diabetes Committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[24]  Stephanie Wu,et al.  Validation of a diabetic foot surgery classification , 2006, International wound journal.

[25]  A. Vinik,et al.  Diabetic neuropathies: clinical manifestations and current treatment options , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology &Metabolism.

[26]  Benjamin A Lipsky,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[27]  W. Costigan,et al.  Operative Management of Ankle Fractures in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[28]  D. Murdoch,et al.  Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's diabetic foot infection classification system. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[29]  Timothy A. Brendle Surgical Care Improvement Project and the perioperative nurse's role. , 2007, AORN journal.

[30]  R. T. Hockenbury,et al.  Use of Implantable Bone Growth Stimulation in Charcot Ankle Arthrodesis , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[31]  M. Pinzur Current Concepts Review: Charcot Arthropathy of the Foot and Ankle , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[32]  Lee C. Rogers,et al.  Predictors of postoperative complications of Ilizarov external ring fixators in the foot and ankle. , 2007, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[33]  L. Neumayer,et al.  Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[34]  Michael J. Mueller,et al.  Comprehensive Foot Examination and Risk Assessment , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[35]  D. Wukich,et al.  Complications Encountered with Circular Ring Fixation in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus , 2008, Foot & ankle international.

[36]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infections at a European University Hospital , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[37]  D. Wukich,et al.  The management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  Richard Hellman,et al.  Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment. A report of the Task Force of the Foot Care Interest Group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. , 2008, Physical therapy.

[39]  L. Lenke,et al.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  F. Cofán,et al.  Incisional surgical site infection in kidney transplantation. , 2008, Urology.

[41]  C. Ko,et al.  Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  M. Olsen,et al.  Improved surveillance for surgical site infections after orthopedic implantation procedures: extending applications for automated data. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[43]  Anders Hamsten,et al.  Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy Associates With Micro- or Macroangiopathy , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[44]  四宮 聡,et al.  医療廃棄物の適正処理によるコスト削減 (特集 感染予防vsヒト・モノ・カネ--「現実」に負けずに効果的な感染予防策を実践するヒント) -- (感染予防策の実践) , 2011 .