Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

[1]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[2]  Brian J. McCourt,et al.  A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Mitchell W Krucoff,et al.  The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2014, Circulation.

[4]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  M. Mates,et al.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Stone,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  David J Cohen,et al.  Association between bleeding events and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, JAMA.

[8]  Christian Pristipino,et al.  Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  L. Jacoby.  Effects of Radial versus Femoral Artery Access in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes with or without ST-segment Elevation , 2013 .

[10]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  J. M. Vázquez-Rodríguez.  Comparación del acceso radial frente al acceso femoral en la revascularización percutánea durante la fase aguda del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST , 2012 .

[12]  Yanbo Wang,et al.  Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with STEMI undergoing early PCI following intravenous thrombolysis. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  Lawrence Joseph,et al.  Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. , 2012, American heart journal.

[14]  John J. Graham,et al.  Characterization of Operator Learning Curve for Transradial Coronary Interventions , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[16]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[17]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Ya‐wei Xu,et al.  Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, Saudi medical journal.

[19]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  L. Gan,et al.  Effectiveness and feasibility of transradial approaches for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2009 .

[21]  D. Holmes,et al.  Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  J. Núñez,et al.  Acceso radial izquierdo en la práctica diaria. Estudio aleatorizado para comparar los accesos femoral, radial derecho y radial izquierdo , 2009 .

[23]  J. Núñez,et al.  The left radial approach in daily practice. A randomized study comparing femoral and right and left radial approaches. , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[24]  Alex J Sutton,et al.  Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[26]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, European heart journal.

[27]  Yu-jie Zhou,et al.  Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2008, Chinese medical journal.

[28]  Y. Gong,et al.  Safety and feasibility of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with the transradial access in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, Chinese medical journal.

[29]  H. White,et al.  Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  M. Hamon,et al.  Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial , 2006, Heart.

[31]  Roger M Harbord,et al.  A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  S. Steinhubl,et al.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2006, Circulation.

[34]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  R. Califf,et al.  Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  B. Strauss,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction--the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. , 2005, American heart journal.

[37]  G. Laarman,et al.  Outpatient coronary angioplasty: Feasible and safe , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[38]  P. Garot,et al.  Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, JAMA.

[40]  W Klein,et al.  Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2004, European heart journal.

[41]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  S. Saito,et al.  Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[43]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  Steven Goodman.  Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes Factor , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  J. Schneider,et al.  Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  M. Petch,et al.  Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations. , 1998, International journal of cardiology.

[47]  L. Missault,et al.  Brachial, radial, or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: a randomized comparison. , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[48]  G. Laarman,et al.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  K. Mann,et al.  Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[50]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[51]  J. Kochman,et al.  Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral--a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE). , 2014, Kardiologia polska.

[52]  Z. Kalarus,et al.  Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial. , 2011, Kardiologia polska.

[53]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[54]  J. Rodríguez.  Comparación del acceso radial frente al acceso femoral en la revascularización percutánea durante la fase aguda del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST , 2010 .

[55]  A. Sokal,et al.  RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial. , 2009, Cardiology journal.

[56]  R. Stables,et al.  Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. , 2008, European heart journal.

[57]  Arrowood,et al.  Right Radial Access for PTCA: A Prospective Study Demonstrates Reduced Complications and Hospital Charges. , 1996, The Journal of invasive cardiology.