A mobile robotic chemist

Technologies such as batteries, biomaterials and heterogeneous catalysts have functions that are defined by mixtures of molecular and mesoscale components. As yet, this multi-length-scale complexity cannot be fully captured by atomistic simulations, and the design of such materials from first principles is still rare 1 – 5 . Likewise, experimental complexity scales exponentially with the number of variables, restricting most searches to narrow areas of materials space. Robots can assist in experimental searches 6 – 14 but their widespread adoption in materials research is challenging because of the diversity of sample types, operations, instruments and measurements required. Here we use a mobile robot to search for improved photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water 15 . The robot operated autonomously over eight days, performing 688 experiments within a ten-variable experimental space, driven by a batched Bayesian search algorithm 16 – 18 . This autonomous search identified photocatalyst mixtures that were six times more active than the initial formulations, selecting beneficial components and deselecting negative ones. Our strategy uses a dexterous 19 , 20 free-roaming robot 21 – 24 , automating the researcher rather than the instruments. This modular approach could be deployed in conventional laboratories for a range of research problems beyond photocatalysis. A mobile robot autonomously operates analytical instruments in a wet chemistry laboratory, performing a photocatalyst optimization task much faster than a human would be able to.

[1]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference , 1977 .

[2]  S. Matsuoka,et al.  Photocatalysis of oligo(p-phenylenes): photoreductive production of hydrogen and ethanol in aqueous triethylamine , 1991 .

[3]  Christopher H. Bryant,et al.  Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Ying Shirley Meng,et al.  Electrodes with High Power and High Capacity for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries , 2006, Science.

[5]  S. Woodley,et al.  Crystal structure prediction from first principles. , 2008, Nature materials.

[6]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[7]  K. Jarrod Millman,et al.  Python for Scientists and Engineers , 2011, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Ross D King,et al.  Rise of the robo scientists. , 2011, Scientific American.

[9]  José Ruíz Ascencio,et al.  Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey , 2012, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[10]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Parallel Algorithm Configuration , 2012, LION.

[11]  R. Schomäcker,et al.  Quantification of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[12]  Steffen Junginger,et al.  Mobile Robot for Life Science Automation , 2013 .

[13]  Steffen Junginger,et al.  A Fast Approach to Arm Blind Grasping and Placing for Mobile Robot Transportation in Laboratories , 2014 .

[14]  Martin D. Burke,et al.  Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process , 2015, Science.

[15]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Peidong Yang,et al.  Cysteine-Cystine Photoregeneration for Oxygenic Photosynthesis of Acetic Acid from CO2 by a Tandem Inorganic-Biological Hybrid System. , 2016, Nano letters.

[17]  Norbert Stoll,et al.  A New Robust Method for Mobile Robot Multifloor Navigation in Distributed Life Science Laboratories , 2016 .

[18]  Ryan P. Adams,et al.  Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. , 2016, Nature materials.

[19]  Andrew I. Cooper,et al.  Functional materials discovery using energy–structure–function maps , 2017, Nature.

[20]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  An autonomous organic reaction search engine for chemical reactivity , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  Chih-Lin Chen,et al.  Dual robotic arm “production line” mass spectrometry assay guided by multiple Arduino-type microcontrollers , 2017 .

[22]  Josh E. Campbell,et al.  Predicted energy–structure–function maps for the evaluation of small molecule organic semiconductors , 2017 .

[23]  Manuel Brucker,et al.  Toward fully autonomous mobile manipulation for industrial environments , 2017 .

[24]  P. Mandal,et al.  Accelerated discovery of two crystal structure types in a complex inorganic phase field , 2017, Nature.

[25]  F. Odobel,et al.  Sacrificial electron donor reagents for solar fuel production , 2017 .

[26]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions , 2018, Science.

[27]  Artur M. Schweidtmann,et al.  Machine learning meets continuous flow chemistry: Automated optimization towards the Pareto front of multiple objectives , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[28]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  ChemOS: Orchestrating autonomous experimentation , 2018, Science Robotics.

[29]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation , 2018, Nature Reviews Materials.

[30]  Reiner Sebastian Sprick,et al.  Understanding structure-activity relationships in linear polymer photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution , 2018, Nature Communications.

[31]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry , 2018, ACS central science.

[32]  Reiner Sebastian Sprick,et al.  Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water , 2018, Nature Chemistry.

[33]  Kerstin Thurow,et al.  Analytical Measurements and Efficient Process Generation Using a Dual–Arm Robot Equipped with Electronic Pipettes , 2018 .

[34]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity , 2018, Nature.

[35]  Aron Walsh,et al.  Computer-aided design of metal chalcohalide semiconductors: from chemical composition to crystal structure† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc03961a , 2017, Chemical science.

[36]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networks , 2018, ICLR.

[37]  X. Mao,et al.  H-bonding effect of oxyanions enhanced photocatalytic degradation of sulfonamides by g-C3N4 in aqueous solution. , 2019, Journal of hazardous materials.

[38]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language , 2019, Science.

[39]  K. Domen,et al.  Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalysts for solar-driven overall water splitting. , 2019, Chemical Society reviews.

[40]  Reiner Sebastian Sprick,et al.  Accelerated Discovery of Organic Polymer Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution from Water through the Integration of Experiment and Theory , 2019, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Jiaxing Jiang,et al.  Poly(dibenzothiophene-S,S-dioxide) with visible light-induced hydrogen evolution rate up to 44.2 mmol h−1 g−1 promoted by K2HPO4 , 2020 .

[42]  Ian M. Pendleton,et al.  Robot-Accelerated Perovskite Investigation and Discovery , 2020, Chemistry of Materials.

[43]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Beyond Ternary OPV: High‐Throughput Experimentation and Self‐Driving Laboratories Optimize Multicomponent Systems , 2019, Advanced materials.

[44]  A. Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials , 2019, Science Advances.