Gamification-based assessment of group work

The importance and benefit of group work is nowadays widely recognized and acknowledged in education. Group work can be supported by online shared workspaces that allow group collaboration. However, the e-assessment of group work remains an issue. Most of the existing strategies rely on intra-group peer assessment to evaluate individual contribution to group work. We propose an alternative by introducing some gamification components. The assessment of students' individual involvement and performance is then shifted to the engagement of students to contribute and participate into a learning community. The goal is to create an enabling environment to stimulate learning by peer sharing and formative feedback. This paper describes the approach, the online learning platform and some of the latest results.

[1]  M. Galton Assessing Group Work , 2010 .

[2]  Vandana Singh,et al.  Learning and best practices for learning in open-source software communities , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Disassembling gamification: the effects of points and meaning on user motivation and performance , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Luis de Marcos,et al.  Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Extending the Elgg Social Networking System to Enhance the Campus Conversation , 2007 .

[6]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[7]  M. Noonan The ethical considerations associated with group work assessments. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[8]  Stan Stanier Community@Brighton: The Development of an Institutional Shared Learning Environment , 2010 .

[9]  P. Davies The automatic generation of ‘Marks for Marking’ within the computerised peer-assessment of essays , 2003 .

[10]  Kirsti Maria Ala-Mutka,et al.  Review of Learning in ICT-enabled Networks and Communities , 2009 .

[11]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Assessing collaboration in a wiki: The reliability of university students' peer assessment , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[12]  Nicola Wilkinson,et al.  A case study of the development of WebPA: An online peer-moderated marking tool , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Using online shared workspaces to support group collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Antonio Fini,et al.  Towards e-Learning 2.0: New Paths for Informal Learning and Lifelong Learning an Application with Personal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[15]  Sabrina Leone,et al.  Pedagogical Sustainability of Interoperable Formal and Informal Learning Environments , 2011 .

[16]  Agnes Higgins,et al.  Self and peer assessment - does it make a difference to student group work? , 2005, Nurse education in practice.

[17]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Mobilization Systems: technologies for motivating and coordinating human action , 2013 .

[18]  Karl M. Kapp,et al.  A Gamified Approach on Learning Logic Gates to Improve Student’s Engagement , 2012, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[19]  John W. Rice,et al.  The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education , 2012, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[20]  Rafael Valencia-García,et al.  Measuring individual learning performance in group work from a knowledge integration perspective , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[21]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Personal Learning Environments and Embedded Contextual Spaces as Aggregator of Cloud Resources , 2012, WCLOUD.