Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch
暂无分享,去创建一个
James M. McQueen | Holger Mitterer | Hans Rutger Bosker | Katja Poellmann | J. McQueen | H. Mitterer | H. Bosker | Katja Poellmann
[1] Anne Cutler,et al. Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[2] Mark A. Pitt,et al. Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants , 2011, J. Phonetics.
[3] Cynthia M Connine,et al. Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] D. Norris,et al. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.
[5] Mirjam Ernestus. The roles of reconstruction and lexical storage in the comprehension of regular pronunciation variants , 2009, INTERSPEECH.
[6] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Phonological Abstraction in Processing Lexical-Tone Variation: Evidence From a Learning Paradigm , 2011, Cogn. Sci..
[7] Alissa Melinger,et al. Constraints on the Transfer of Perceptual Learning in Accented Speech , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[8] D. Gow. Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] James M. McQueen,et al. Treack or trit: Adaptation to genuine and arbitrary foreign accents by monolingual and bilingual listeners , 2014, J. Phonetics.
[10] J. McQueen,et al. Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .
[11] Eva Reinisch,et al. Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories? , 2014, J. Phonetics.
[12] D. Dahan,et al. Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? , 2008, Cognition.
[13] Joan L. Bybee. Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.
[14] D. Gow. Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .
[15] J. McQueen,et al. Use what you can: storage, abstraction processes, and perceptual adjustments help listeners recognize reduced forms , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[16] Henning Reetz,et al. Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing , 2010, J. Phonetics.
[17] Linda Shockey,et al. Sound Patterns of Spoken English , 2003 .
[18] W. Marslen-Wilson. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.
[19] L. Pols,et al. Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Eva Reinisch,et al. The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context , 2013, J. Phonetics.
[21] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[22] Mark A Pitt,et al. The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] Marc Brysbaert,et al. SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[24] M. Ernestus. Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .
[25] Ferenc Honbolygo,et al. The Recognition of Phonologically Assimilated Words Does Not Depend on Specific Language Experience , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[26] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .
[27] James M. McQueen,et al. Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception , 2013, Cognition.
[28] J. McQueen,et al. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[29] A. Samuel,et al. First Impressions and Last Resorts , 2008, Psychological science.
[30] Natasha Warner,et al. Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK , 2005 .
[32] R. Schreuder,et al. The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms , 2002, Brain and Language.
[33] D. Pisoni,et al. Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[34] D. Broadbent,et al. Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .
[35] Taehong Cho,et al. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.
[36] S. Kinoshita,et al. Visual and Auditory Recognition of Prefixed Words , 1986 .
[37] V. Csépe,et al. The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[38] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch , 2006, J. Phonetics.
[39] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers , 2007 .
[40] James M. McQueen,et al. Phonetic content influences voice discriminability , 2007 .
[41] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .
[42] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.
[43] Louis C. W. Pols,et al. Formant frequencies of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate , 1990 .
[44] S. Brouwer. Processing strongly reduced forms in casual speech , 2010 .
[45] Jean Christophe Verstraeh. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .
[46] Susanne Brouwer,et al. Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[47] J. McQueen,et al. Foreign Subtitles Help but Native-Language Subtitles Harm Foreign Speech Perception , 2009, PloS one.
[48] Keith Johnson. Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .
[49] William D. Raymond,et al. Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .
[50] R. H. Baayen,et al. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .
[51] Matthias J. Sjerps,et al. Listening to different speakers: On the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[52] David Patterson,et al. Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English , 2003, Phonetica.
[53] D. Norris,et al. Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.
[54] Susanne Brouwer,et al. Discourse context and the recognition of reduced and canonical spoken words , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[55] Nelleke Oostdijk,et al. The Spoken Dutch Corpus Project , 1999 .
[56] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[57] Cynthia M. Connine,et al. Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition , 2007 .
[58] Joseph C. Toscano,et al. Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[59] C. Fougeron,et al. How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation , 2010 .
[60] Holger Mitterer,et al. How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[61] D. Barr. Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .
[62] P. Luce,et al. Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .
[63] M. Pitt,et al. Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon , 1998 .
[64] J. McQueen,et al. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[65] Rochelle S. Newman,et al. Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another , 2009, J. Phonetics.
[66] H. Mitterer,et al. No delays in application of perceptual learning in speech recognition: Evidence from eye tracking , 2013 .
[67] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .
[68] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[69] J. McQueen,et al. Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[70] Mirjam Ernestus,et al. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[71] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical Adaptation to a Novel Accent , 2008, Cogn. Sci..