Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch

Abstract This study investigates if and how listeners adapt to reductions in casual continuous speech. In a perceptual-learning variant of the visual-world paradigm, two groups of Dutch participants were exposed to either segmental (/b/ → [ʋ]) or syllabic (ver- → [fː]) reductions in spoken Dutch sentences. In the test phase, both groups heard both kinds of reductions, but now applied to different words. In one of two experiments, the segmental reduction exposure group was better than the syllabic reduction exposure group in recognizing new reduced /b/-words. In both experiments, the syllabic reduction group showed a greater target preference for new reduced ver-words. Learning about reductions was thus applied to previously unheard words. This lexical generalization suggests that mechanisms compensating for segmental and syllabic reductions take place at a prelexical level, and hence that lexical access involves an abstractionist mode of processing. Existing abstractionist models need to be revised, however, as they do not include representations of sequences of segments (corresponding e.g. to ver-) at the prelexical level.

[1]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Exploring the role of exposure frequency in recognizing pronunciation variants , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[3]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[5]  Mirjam Ernestus The roles of reconstruction and lexical storage in the comprehension of regular pronunciation variants , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[6]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in Processing Lexical-Tone Variation: Evidence From a Learning Paradigm , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Constraints on the Transfer of Perceptual Learning in Accented Speech , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[8]  D. Gow Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Treack or trit: Adaptation to genuine and arbitrary foreign accents by monolingual and bilingual listeners , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[10]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .

[11]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories? , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[12]  D. Dahan,et al.  Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? , 2008, Cognition.

[13]  Joan L. Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[14]  D. Gow Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .

[15]  J. McQueen,et al.  Use what you can: storage, abstraction processes, and perceptual adjustments help listeners recognize reduced forms , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[17]  Linda Shockey,et al.  Sound Patterns of Spoken English , 2003 .

[18]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[19]  L. Pols,et al.  Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[21]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[22]  Mark A Pitt,et al.  The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[24]  M. Ernestus Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .

[25]  Ferenc Honbolygo,et al.  The Recognition of Phonologically Assimilated Words Does Not Depend on Specific Language Experience , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[27]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception , 2013, Cognition.

[28]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Samuel,et al.  First Impressions and Last Resorts , 2008, Psychological science.

[30]  Natasha Warner,et al.  Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK , 2005 .

[32]  R. Schreuder,et al.  The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms , 2002, Brain and Language.

[33]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[35]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[36]  S. Kinoshita,et al.  Visual and Auditory Recognition of Prefixed Words , 1986 .

[37]  V. Csépe,et al.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[39]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers , 2007 .

[40]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Phonetic content influences voice discriminability , 2007 .

[41]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[42]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Formant frequencies of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate , 1990 .

[44]  S. Brouwer Processing strongly reduced forms in casual speech , 2010 .

[45]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[46]  Susanne Brouwer,et al.  Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  J. McQueen,et al.  Foreign Subtitles Help but Native-Language Subtitles Harm Foreign Speech Perception , 2009, PloS one.

[48]  Keith Johnson Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .

[49]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[50]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[51]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Listening to different speakers: On the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  David Patterson,et al.  Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English , 2003, Phonetica.

[53]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  Susanne Brouwer,et al.  Discourse context and the recognition of reduced and canonical spoken words , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[55]  Nelleke Oostdijk,et al.  The Spoken Dutch Corpus Project , 1999 .

[56]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[57]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition , 2007 .

[58]  Joseph C. Toscano,et al.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[59]  C. Fougeron,et al.  How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation , 2010 .

[60]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[62]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[63]  M. Pitt,et al.  Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon , 1998 .

[64]  J. McQueen,et al.  Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Rochelle S. Newman,et al.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[66]  H. Mitterer,et al.  No delays in application of perceptual learning in speech recognition: Evidence from eye tracking , 2013 .

[67]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[68]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  J. McQueen,et al.  Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical Adaptation to a Novel Accent , 2008, Cogn. Sci..