The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions

How do we make simple purchasing decisions (e.g., whether or not to buy a product at a given price)? Previous work has shown that the attentional drift-diffusion model (aDDM) can provide accurate quantitative descriptions of the psychometric data for binary and trinary value-based choices, and of how the choice process is guided by visual attention. Here we extend the aDDM to the case of purchasing decisions, and test it using an eye-tracking experiment. We find that the model also provides a reasonably accurate quantitative description of the relationship between choice, reaction time, and visual fixations using parameters that are very similar to those that best fit the previous data. The only critical difference is that the choice biases induced by the fixations are about half as big in purchasing decisions as in binary choices. This suggests that a similar computational process is used to make binary choices, trinary choices, and simple purchasing decisions.

[1]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. , 2005, Psychological review.

[2]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for 'Asymmetric Paternalism' , 2003 .

[3]  R. Ratcliff A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  A. Rangel,et al.  Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[6]  R. Bogacz Optimal decision-making theories: linking neurobiology with behaviour , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  A. Rangel,et al.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Network approaches for expert decisions in sports. , 2012, Human movement science.

[10]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Psychological models of deferred decision making , 1988 .

[11]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  How Distinct are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[14]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[15]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Thinking about Attention in Games: Backward and Forward Induction , 2004 .

[16]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[17]  N. Chater,et al.  Preference reversal in multiattribute choice. , 2010, Psychological review.

[18]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  Choosing an Inferior Alternative , 2006, Psychological science.

[19]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Computational Models of Decision Making , 2003 .

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice , 2012 .

[21]  R Ratcliff,et al.  A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[22]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Information displays and preference reversals , 1988 .

[23]  A. Diederich MDFT account of decision making under time pressure , 2003, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[24]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. , 2004, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[29]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  P. Glimcher,et al.  The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy , 2009, Neuron.

[31]  Adele Diederich,et al.  Survey of decision field theory , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[32]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[33]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  An eye‐tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes , 2011 .

[34]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[35]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[36]  Marius Usher,et al.  Testing Multi-Alternative Decision Models with Non-Stationary Evidence , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[38]  Mark T. Waters,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Thislicensedoesnot permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without sp , 2009 .

[39]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The neurodynamics of choice, value-based decisions and preference reversal , 2008 .

[42]  Puiu F. Balan,et al.  Attention as a decision in information space , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Diederich,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[44]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Review Frontal Cortex and Reward-guided Learning and Decision-making Figure 1. Frontal Brain Regions in the Macaque Involved in Reward-guided Learning and Decision-making Finer Grained Anatomical Divisions with Frontal Cortical Systems for Reward-guided Behavior , 2022 .

[45]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[46]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  Atanu Sengupta,et al.  Framework of Study , 2013 .

[48]  Marios G Philiastides,et al.  A mechanistic account of value computation in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The distortion of information to support an emerging evaluation of risk , 2011 .

[51]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  Christof Koch,et al.  The Drift Diffusion Model Can Account for the Accuracy and Reaction Time of Value-Based Choices Under High and Low Time Pressure , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[53]  F. Christian How the Brain Integrates Costs and Benefits During Decision Making , 2010 .