Do Juries Deliberate? A Study of Deliberation, Individual Difference, and Group Member Satisfaction at a Municipal Courthouse

Despite long-standing interest in juries and a growing body of work on public deliberation, we have a limited understanding of how often everyday juries actually engage in meaningful deliberation. This study uses deliberative theory and small group research to develop a set of research questions and hypotheses regarding how juror characteristics promote deliberation as well as how deliberation influences juror satisfaction. Examination of 267 jurors' accounts of their experiences deliberating on municipal criminal juries suggests that juries do, indeed, deliberate at a remarkably high level of competence. Results show complex relationships between juror characteristics and their levels of deliberation as well as a direct link between the quality of deliberation and juror satisfaction.

[1]  Descriptors Higher.  Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association , 1974 .

[2]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[3]  James Miller.  Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[4]  Ann Burnett Pettus.  “The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations—from the jurors' point of view” , 1990 .

[5]  J. Oetzel.  Self-Construals, Communication Processes, and Group Outcomes in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups , 2001 .

[6]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[7]  V. Amar.  Jury Service as Political Participation Akin to Voting , 1995 .

[8]  Joann Keyton,et al.  Evaluating Individual Group Member Satisfaction as a Situational Variable , 1991 .

[9]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. , 1996 .

[10]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[11]  A. Brownlie.  Judging the Jury , 1973 .

[12]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Inside the jury room: Evaluating juror discussions during trial , 2003 .

[13]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[14]  M. Sandys,et al.  First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials , 1995 .

[15]  D. Seibold,et al.  Jurors' intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication injury decision making , 1998 .

[16]  Dennis S. Gouran.  Correlates of member satisfaction in group decision‐making discussions , 1973 .

[17]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[18]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Group performance and collaborative technology: a longitudinal and multilevel analysis of information quality, contribution equity, and members' satisfaction in computer‐mediated groups , 2004 .

[19]  Diane M. Badzinski,et al.  An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision‐making process , 2000 .

[20]  John Gastil,et al.  Jury Service and Electoral Participation: A Test of the Participation Hypothesis , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[21]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items , 1990 .

[22]  N. Kerr,et al.  Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[24]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[25]  J. Payne,et al.  A Study of Juror and Jury Judgments in Civil Cases: Deciding Liability for Punitive Damages , 1998 .

[26]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Communication of Political Expertise , 2001 .

[27]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. , 2001 .

[28]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[29]  J. I. Turner.  Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice , 2003 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  S. Chambers,et al.  DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY , 2003 .

[32]  E. G. Bormann.  Symbolic Convergence Theory and Communication in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[33]  W. Barnett Pearce,et al.  Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide , 1997 .

[34]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[35]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[36]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[37]  Jason Barabas,et al.  How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Autocracy and Democracy. , 1961 .

[39]  B. Wright.  Of Democracy in America , 1946, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Neil Vidmar,et al.  Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation , 2003 .