Three-dimensional cell culturing by magnetic levitation for evaluating efficacy/toxicity of photodynamic therapy

We used three dimensional cell cultures (3D) based on the magnetic levitation method (MLM) to evaluate cytotoxicity of photodynamic therapy (PDT). First, we decorated Hep G2 and MDA-MB-321 cells with NanoShuttle by introducing it in the media and incubated overnight. Next day, we transferred the cells to a 6-well plate and placed a magnetic driver on the top of the plate to start levitation. We monitored the formation of the 3D cell culture by optical microscopy and after four days, we added the photosensitizer Photogem (PG) in the culture media in concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25μg/ml. We incubated them for 24 hours, after that we washed the cultures with PBS and added fresh media. Samples were then illuminated for 600s using a 630nm LED-based device, generating light intensities of 30 mW/cm2 in a total light fluence of 18 J/cm2. Following the illumination, we added fresh media, and 30 hours later, the 3D structures were broken using a pipettor and the cells seeded in 96 well plates, 105 cells per well, with a magnetic drive placed on the bottom of the plate to create cell culture dots. After 24 hours, we used a MTT assay to evaluate PDT cytotoxicity. The PDT effect, evaluated by the half maximal effective concentration (EC50), in MDA-MB-231 cells (EC50 =3.14 μg/ml) is more aggressive compared to the effect of PDT in Hep G2 cells (EC50 = 7.48 μg/ml). It suggests that the cell culture structure and its interaction facilitated the PG uptake and consequently elevated the Photodynamic effect for MDA-MB-231.

[1]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Quantification of tumor tissue populations by multispectral analysis , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  James A Bankson,et al.  Three-dimensional tissue culture based on magnetic cell levitation. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  J. H. Kinsey,et al.  Photodynamic effect of hematoporphyrin derivative as a function of optical spectrum and incident energy density. , 1981, Cancer research.

[4]  Stanley B. Brown,et al.  Investigation of Cross-resistance to a Range of Photosensitizers, Hyperthermia and UV Light in Two Radiation-induced Fibrosarcoma Cell Strains Resistant to Photodynamic Therapy In Vitro¶ , 2001, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[5]  Cristina Kurachi,et al.  Experimental evidence and model explanation for cell population characteristics modification when applying sequential photodynamic therapy , 2011 .

[6]  B. Wilson,et al.  The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  P. Jaen,et al.  Disorganisation of cytoskeleton in cells resistant to photodynamic treatment with decreased metastatic phenotype. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[8]  S. Verbridge,et al.  Tissue-engineered three-dimensional tumor models to study tumor angiogenesis. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[9]  L. Kunz-Schughart,et al.  Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[10]  Q. Peng,et al.  Photodynamic Therapy , 1988, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[11]  William L. Haisler,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culturing by magnetic levitation , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[12]  Claudio H. Sibata,et al.  Experimental determination of threshold dose in photodynamic therapy in normal rat liver , 2007 .