An investigation of State Educational Twitter Hashtags (SETHs) as affinity spaces

Affinity spaces are digital or physical spaces in which participants interact with one another around content of shared interest and through a common portal (or platform). Among teachers, some of the largest affinity spaces may be those organized around hashtags on Twitter: These spaces are public, largely unmoderated, and thriving, yet very little is known about them, especially those based in geographical areas such as American states. This paper examines these potential affinity spaces by providing the first large-scale study of them in the form of an examination of 47 State Educational Twitter Hashtags (SETHs). Collecting over 550,000 tweets over 6 months, our analysis focused on who is participating in SETHs, how active participants are, and when participation occurred. We found support for two of Gee's tenets of affinity spaces, in particular many interactions through a shared portal. Though the content of tweets were not the focus, this study’s findings lend support to efforts to identify which particular SETHs will be best suited to subsequent analysis of their content and what times subsequent analysis might most productively focus on. We discuss implications for how we conceive of teacher professional development and suggest directions for future research focused on the content of tweets associated with SETHs.

[1]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[2]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  Ryan D. Visser,et al.  #TwitterforTeachers: The Implications of Twitter as a Self-Directed Professional Development Tool for K–12 Teachers , 2014 .

[4]  Hayley Watson,et al.  Digital Methods as Mainstream Methodology: An Introduction , 2016 .

[5]  Jeffrey P. Carpenter,et al.  Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter , 2015 .

[6]  Virginia G. Britt,et al.  “Beyond the Four Walls of My Building”: A Case Study of #Edchat as a Community of Practice , 2016 .

[7]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[8]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics , 2014 .

[9]  D. Hunt Cognition and Learning , 1989 .

[10]  K. Squire,et al.  Videogames and learning , 2014 .

[11]  Sean C. Duncan,et al.  Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[12]  K. Squire Open-Ended Video Games: A Model for Developing Learning for the Interactive Age , 2007 .

[13]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Learning in Activity , 2014 .

[14]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Benjamin Gleason,et al.  #Occupy Wall Street , 2013 .

[16]  R. Woodworth AMERICAN EDUCATION. , 1910, Science.

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[19]  E. Kassens-Noor Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets , 2012 .

[20]  Daniel G. Krutka,et al.  How and Why Educators Use Twitter: A Survey of the Field , 2014 .

[21]  George Siemens,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics , 2014 .

[22]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[23]  Alecia Marie Magnifico,et al.  Toward an Affinity Space Methodology: Considerations for Literacy Research , 2012 .

[24]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging , 2011 .

[25]  Alistair Inglis Learning in virtual worlds , 1991 .

[26]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Serious games analytics : methodologies for performance measurement, assessment, and improvement , 2015 .

[27]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives , 2012 .

[28]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  “Pretty Good Practices” for the Design of Teacher Portfolio Courses , 2015 .