Evaluation of trajectories and contact pressures for the straight nucleus cochlear implant electrode array - a two-dimensional application of finite element analysis.

A two-dimensional (2D) finite element analysis has been used in this study to model the insertion of the Nucleus electrode array with different stiffness properties in order to evaluate the propensity of damage by visualizing the predicted trajectories and by comparing the buckling stresses and the contact pressures at the tip (and its distribution along the length) of the electrode array. Previous temporal bone studies have shown that damage during insertion of an electrode array around the basal turn of the cochlear spiral could be related to the design and the stiffness properties of the electrode array. However, it is difficult to evaluate different designs of electrode arrays purely by experimental methods as the experimental conditions and their results are difficult to reproduce. Three electrode arrays with different mechanical properties, i.e. uniform stiffness, graded stiffness, and a soft tip have been modelled. Buckling stress and contact pressure at the tip of the electrode array were found to be highest for the arrays with uniform stiffness. The contact pressures at the tip of the electrode array appeared strongly influenced by the stiffness profile and were optimal for graded stiffness. The results indicate the importance of the electrode array design and stiffness properties in minimizing trauma. However, there are a number of limitations in the present 2D evaluation which will require further analysis using a three-dimensional model to obtain definitive results.

[1]  G M Clark,et al.  Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[2]  Refined Surgical Technique for Insertion of Banded Electrode Array , 1987 .

[3]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[4]  G M Clark,et al.  Dimensions of the Scala Tympani in the Human and Cat with Reference to Cochlear Implants , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear implants in the Third Millennium. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[6]  G M Clark,et al.  The Contour Electrode Array: Safety Study and Initial Patient Trials of a New Perimodiolar Design , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  S. Choi,et al.  Analysis of plane strain rolling by the dynamic relaxation method , 1989 .

[8]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[9]  G M Clark,et al.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[10]  R. L. Webb,et al.  Surgery for the Safe Insertion and Reinsertion of the Banded Electrode Array , 1987 .

[11]  J. F. Patrick,et al.  Characterization of Mechanical Properties of Single Electrodes and Multielectrodes , 1987 .

[12]  D W Kennedy,et al.  Multichannel intracochlear electrodes: Mechanism of insertion trauma , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Anthony Unsworth,et al.  Recent developments in the tribology of artificial joints , 1995 .

[14]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[15]  W. House,et al.  Otopathological findings in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.