Flexible habitat selection paves the way for a recovery of otter populations in the European Alps

Abstract Carnivores are threatened worldwide through habitat loss and persecution. Habitat destruction is a major threat for the Eurasian otter. Its populations declined drastically in Europe but are now expanding again, including into the Alps. Here, flood prevention and hydropower have massively altered the riverine landscapes. We evaluated the recovery potential of otters by testing the impact of major factors of habitat transformation and human disturbance on multiple spatial scales. In a hierarchical approach, we investigated spatial use and foraging habitat selection of nine otters in a long-term radiotracking study in the eastern Central Alps. We combined fine scale habitat selection analysis with individual movements by applying a step-selection function approach to the linear river system in a novel way. At home range scale, otters preferred the main riverbeds to abstracted water and tributaries, whereas at fine scale, there was no significant preference for pristine sections within the watercourses. Otters selected for reservoirs in streams with a width smaller than 12 m and otherwise preferred foraging in residual waters and stretches with main discharge. At this stage of recovery, otters show a surprising flexibility in their habitat selection. This is promising for the species' future expansion into former abandoned areas. However, given that the traditional fish stocking regime might contribute to this recovery by providing profitable hunting grounds after stocking events, there is an increased risk of human-wildlife conflicts. Our results demonstrate a high adaptability of a threatened carnivore to altered landscapes and show how this flexible behaviour opens opportunities for recovery.

[1]  P. Ferreras,et al.  Drivers of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) daily activity: prey availability, human disturbance or habitat structure? , 2016 .

[2]  J. Kloskowski,et al.  Resource availability and use by Eurasian otters Lutra lutra in a heavily modified river-canal system , 2013 .

[3]  Ryan A. McManamay,et al.  REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS APPLIED TO HYDROLOGY: CAN LANDSCAPE-BASED FRAMEWORKS CAPTURE THE HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY? , 2011 .

[4]  Radu V. Craiu,et al.  Conditional Logistic Regression With Longitudinal Follow-up and Individual-Level Random Coefficients: A Stable and Efficient Two-Step Estimation Method , 2011 .

[5]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[6]  M. Boyce,et al.  Flexible habitat selection by cougars in response to anthropogenic development , 2014 .

[7]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[8]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Quantitative measurement of food selection , 1974, Oecologia.

[9]  Francesco Comiti,et al.  How natural are Alpine mountain rivers? Evidence from the Italian Alps , 2012 .

[10]  Armin Peter,et al.  Hydropower production and river rehabilitation: A case study on an alpine river , 2007 .

[11]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[12]  R. Kuehn,et al.  Impact of fish stocking on Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) densities: A case study on two salmonid streams , 2015 .

[13]  J. Fox Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models , 2003 .

[14]  A. Kranz Otters (Lutra lutra) increasing in Central Europe: from the threat of extinction to locally perceived overpopulation? , 2000 .

[15]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  M. Santos‐Reis,et al.  Prey availability and diet of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) on a large reservoir and associated tributaries , 2007 .

[17]  T. Dunne,et al.  Quantifying the role of woody debris in providing bioenergetically favorable habitat for juvenile salmon , 2013 .

[18]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Response of resident brown trout, Salmo trutta L., and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), to the stocking of hatchery‐reared brown trout , 1999 .

[19]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[20]  P. Ferreras,et al.  EFFECTS OF FLOW REGULATION AND NON‐NATIVE SPECIES ON FEEDING HABITS OF EURASIAN OTTER Lutra lutra IN MEDITERRANEAN TEMPORARY RIVERS , 2014 .

[21]  C. Mason,et al.  Otters : an action plan for their conservation , 1990 .

[22]  L. Durbin Habitat selection by five otters Lutra lutra in rivers of northern Scotland , 1998 .

[23]  J. Pauli,et al.  Quantifying risk and resource use for a large carnivore in an expanding urban-wildland interface , 2016 .

[24]  M. Elmeros,et al.  Recovery of the otter Lutra lutra in Denmark monitored by field surveys and collection of carcasses , 2006 .

[25]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[26]  J. Finn,et al.  Streamflow regulation and fish community structure , 1988 .

[27]  N. Reid,et al.  Review and quantitative meta-analysis of diet suggests the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) is likely to be a poor bioindicator , 2013 .

[28]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[29]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[30]  M. Delibes,et al.  Trophic diversity of the otter (Lutra lutra L.) in temperate and Mediterranean freshwater habitats , 2003 .

[31]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. , 2009, Ecology.

[32]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Diet composition of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in different freshwater habitats of temperate Europe: a review and meta‐analysis , 2016 .

[33]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Reproductive success of female leopards Panthera pardus: the importance of top-down processes , 2013 .

[34]  Edward D. Weber,et al.  Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition , 2003 .

[35]  C. Downs,et al.  Sex-specific indicators of landscape use by servals: Consequences of living in fragmented landscapes , 2015 .

[36]  L. Durbin Individual differences in spatial utilization of a river-system by otters Lutra lutra , 1996 .

[37]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[38]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results , 2003 .

[39]  F. Bontadina,et al.  The diet of urban foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) and the availability of anthropogenic food in the city of Zurich, Switzerland , 2004 .

[40]  B. Nolet,et al.  DIVING OF OTTERS (LUTRA-LUTRA) IN A MARINE HABITAT - USE OF DEPTHS BY A SINGLE-PREY LOADER , 1993 .

[41]  O. Liberg,et al.  Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes , 2014, Science.

[42]  M. Fischer,et al.  Landnutzung und biologische Vielfalt in den Alpen : Fakten, Perspektiven, Empfehlungen : thematische Synthese zum Forschungsschwerpunkt II "Land- und Forstwirtschaft im alpinen Lebensraum" : Nationales Forschungsprogramm 48 "Landschaften und Lebensräume der Alpen" des Schweizerischen Nationalfonds : , 2007 .

[43]  T. Lodé,et al.  Efficiency of conservation shortcuts: an investigation with otters as umbrella species , 2005 .

[44]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  C. Wilmers,et al.  Top carnivores increase their kill rates on prey as a response to human-induced fear , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Margarida Santos-Reis,et al.  The response of otters to environmental changes imposed by the construction of large dams , 2014 .

[47]  Zengo Furukawa,et al.  A General Framework for , 1991 .

[48]  B. Lukács,et al.  Effects of extensive fishpond management and human disturbance factors on Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra L. 1758) populations in Eastern Europe , 2013 .

[49]  P. Poncin,et al.  Tolerance to anthropogenic disturbance by a large carnivore: the case of Eurasian lynx in south‐eastern Norway , 2015 .

[50]  E. Virgós,et al.  Changes in otter Lutra lutra distribution in Central Spain in the 1964-1995 period , 1998 .

[51]  C. Prigioni,et al.  Decline and recovery in otter Lutra lutra populations in Italy , 2007 .

[52]  R. Bravo,et al.  Conservation of otter (Lutra lutra) in a Mediterranean area: the importance of habitat quality and temporal variation in water availability , 2001 .

[53]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores , 2014, Science.

[54]  LUGHAIDH Ó NÉILL,et al.  Minimizing Leg-Hold Trapping Trauma for Otters With Mobile Phone Technology , 2007 .

[55]  Wayne M Getz,et al.  Home range plus: a space-time characterization of movement over real landscapes , 2013, Movement ecology.

[56]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[57]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow‐dependent species , 2013 .

[58]  John Fox,et al.  Effect Displays for Generalized Linear Models , 1987 .

[59]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  Otters: Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation , 2006 .

[60]  H. Kruuk Wild Otters: Predation and Populations , 1995 .