Evolution of semen quality in North-eastern Spain: a study in 22,759 infertile men over a 36 year period.

A retrospective study was conducted in a large population to determine whether sperm quality has changed in Northeastern Spain between 1960 and 1996. From a total initial population of 22,759 men, two separate groups were studied: men with spermatozoa (n = 20,411) and those with azoospermia (n = 1364). After adjustment for age and sexual abstinence, multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess changes in semen parameters over time. A 0.2% decline was observed in semen volume in the spermatozoa group (P < 0.001). No significant increase (0.04%) in sperm count (x 10(6)/ml) was observed in the spermatozoa group. There was a 0.4% increase in motile spermatozoa in the spermatozoa group (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant decline in normal spermatozoa (3.6%) in the spermatozoa group (P < 0.001). Of the total population, 1364 men had azoospermia (6.0%). The changes observed in the semen parameters analysed in this large population showed no evidence of a deteriorating sperm quality, although a statistically significant decline was observed in the percentage of normal spermatozoa.

[1]  A. Pappa,et al.  Andrology: Seminal volume and total sperm number trends in men attending subfertllity clinics in the Greater Athens area during the period 1977–1993 , 1996 .

[2]  S. Leto,et al.  Changing parameters of donor semen. , 1981, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  E. Bendvold.  Semen quality in Norwegian men over a 20-year period. , 1989, International journal of fertility.

[4]  R. Bunge,et al.  Semen analysis: evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. , 1974, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  J. Egozcue,et al.  Which semen parameters have a predictive value for pregnancy in infertile couples? , 1994, Human reproduction.

[6]  L. Lipshultz.  "The debate continues"--the continuing debate over the possible decline in semen quality. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  J. H. Olson,et al.  Semen analyses in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  C. A. Paulsen,et al.  Methodological issues in the analysis of human sperm concentration data. , 1996, Journal of andrology.

[9]  J. Suominen,et al.  Semen quality of Finnish men. , 1993, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[10]  E. Wallach,et al.  Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: a review of the past, a study of the present. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  N. Keiding,et al.  Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. , 1992 .

[12]  J. Auger.  Evidence for regional differences of semen quality among fertile French men Fédération Française des CECOS , 1997 .

[13]  C. A. Paulsen,et al.  Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  L. Lipshultz,et al.  Have sperm counts been reduced 50 percent in 50 years? A statistical model revisited. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  F. Comhaire,et al.  Deterioration of sperm quality in young healthy Belgian men. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[16]  J. Cohen,et al.  Decline in sperm counts: an artefact of changed reference range of “normal”? , 1994, BMJ.

[17]  J Scott-Wilson,et al.  Book Review: Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction , 1982, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[18]  R Eliasson,et al.  Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. , 1980 .

[19]  R. Mieusset,et al.  Time series analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992 , 1996, BMJ.

[20]  H. Fisch,et al.  Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  S. Irvine,et al.  Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years , 1996, BMJ.

[22]  J. Macleod.  HUMAN SEMINAL CYTOLOGY AS A SENSITIVE INDICATOR OF THE GERMINAL EPITHELIUM. , 1964, International journal of fertility.

[23]  P Wölner-Hanssen,et al.  No evidence of deteriorating semen quality among men in infertile relationships during the last decade: a study of males from Southern Sweden. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[24]  N. Berman,et al.  Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform * † , 1996 .

[25]  D. Mortimer,et al.  Decreasing quality of semen. , 1992, BMJ.

[26]  E. Bostofte,et al.  Has the fertility of Danish men declined through the years in terms of semen quality? A comparison of semen qualities between 1952 and 1972. , 1983, International journal of fertility.

[27]  W. Krause,et al.  Decreasing quality of semen. , 1992, BMJ.

[28]  David Handelsman.  Sperm output of healthy men in Australia: magnitude of bias due to self-selected volunteers. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[29]  A. Pappa,et al.  Seminal volume and total sperm number trends in men attending subfertility clinics in the greater Athens area during the period 1977-1993. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[30]  Pierre Jouannet,et al.  Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years , 1995 .