A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity

Weeds have an important role in maintaining farmland biodiversity. This needs to be balanced with their potential negative impact on crop yield and quality. Mechanistic models of crop-weed competition are an important tool in striking this balance. A range of common UK annual weeds were screened for the eco-physiological traits required by the models. Using multivariate techniques, a number of functional groups with a similar pattern of productivity and competition were identified, based on trade-offs between traits. A scheme was developed to assign species outside of the data set to one of the groups, based on life cycle, seed mass, maximum height and time of first flowering. As well as having a similar competitive ability, species within a group also appeared to have a similar ecosystem function, in terms of supporting higher trophic groups. Two beneficial groups of species were identified that combined a relatively low competitive ability with a high importance for invertebrates and birds. The identification of functional groups in the UK arable flora is a useful tool for assessing a weed community in the context of reconciling biodiversity provision with crop production. Preserving beneficial plant functional types within the crop would complement non-cropped wildlife refuges, such as field margins.

[1]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[2]  J. Storkey Modelling assimilation rates of 14 temperate arable weed species as a function of the environment and leaf traits , 2005 .

[3]  C. Hawes,et al.  Individuals as the basic accounting unit in studies of ecosystem function: functional diversity in shepherd's purse, Capsella , 2005 .

[4]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Sustainable Arable Farming For an Improved Environment (SAFFIE): managing winter wheat sward structure for Skylarks Alauda arvensis , 2004 .

[5]  D. Allen,et al.  Habitat establishment on arable land: assessment of an agri-environment scheme in England, UK , 2004 .

[6]  S. Moss,et al.  Symposium The Broadbalk long-term experiment at Rothamsted: what has it told us about weeds? , 2004, Weed Science.

[7]  J. Storkey Modelling seedling growth rates of 18 temperate arable weed species as a function of the environment and plant traits. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[8]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[9]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[10]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  Robert E. Blackshaw,et al.  Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen , 2003, Weed Science.

[12]  L. K. Ward,et al.  The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields , 2003 .

[13]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  An evaluation of four crop : weed competition models using a common data set , 2003 .

[14]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain , 2002 .

[15]  R. Bunce,et al.  Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales , 2000 .

[16]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Design of weed management systems with a reduced reliance on herbicides poses new challenges and prerequisites for modeling crop–weed interactions , 2000 .

[17]  O. L. Sutcliffe,et al.  Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s , 2000 .

[18]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The second Silent Spring? , 1999, Nature.

[19]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti , 1999 .

[20]  Zaragoza,et al.  Competition between maize and Datura stramonium in an irrigated field under semi-arid conditions , 1999 .

[21]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indices , 1998 .

[22]  D. J. Webb,et al.  The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices , 1996 .

[23]  M. J. Kropff,et al.  A simulation model of competition between winter wheat and Avena fatua for light. , 1994 .

[24]  R. Pearce,et al.  Growth Analysis of Weed and Crop Species with Reference to Seed Weight , 1993, Weed Science.

[25]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. I : Model description and parameterization , 1992 .

[26]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  N. Sotherton The Environmental Benefits of Conservation Headlands in Cereal Fields , 1992 .

[28]  K. J. Wright,et al.  Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat , 1990 .

[29]  R. Peters,et al.  The allometry of seed weight and seedling relative growth rate. , 1990 .

[30]  E. Marshall DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF PLANTS ASSOCIATED WITH ARABLE FIELD EDGES , 1989 .

[31]  W. Krzanowski,et al.  A Criterion for Determining the Number of Groups in a Data Set Using Sum-of-Squares Clustering , 1988 .

[32]  M. Fenner RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SEED WEIGHT, ASH CONTENT AND SEEDLING GROWTH IN TWENTY‐FOUR SPECIES OF COMPOSITAE , 1983 .