The effectiveness of personally tailored computer-generated advice letters for smoking cessation.

AIM To assess the effectiveness of a new computer-generated tailored advice programme designed to be used by smokers and recent quitters having problems staying stopped. DESIGN Randomized trial comparing a series of questionnaire assessments leading to tailored computer-generated advice letters mailed at strategically relevant times, to a no extra treatment control sent standardized printed self-help materials. SETTING Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1058 smokers or recent quitters recruited from callers to the Quitline. MEASUREMENTS Smoking status and sustained abstinence at 12-month follow-up, plus extent of participation in the intervention. FINDINGS Using a conservative analysis (missing data coded as a treatment failure), 6-month sustained abstinence was reported by significantly more participants in the computer-generated tailored advice (20%) than the standard printed materials condition (12%) at 12-month follow-up OR 1.82 (1.31-2.55)). Group differences in point prevalence abstinence (28% intervention, 25% control) were not significant. Among participants in the tailored advice condition, 6-month sustained abstinence was associated with the number of advice letters received. CONCLUSION The provision of a series of tailored, computer-generated advice letters resulted in greater rates of sustained cessation than for controls. A dose-response relationship was found, with increased compliance with the intervention associated with improved cessation outcomes. The programme appears to have much of its effect by preventing relapse.

[1]  W F Velicer,et al.  Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[2]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[3]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Is stage-of-change a useful measure of the likelihood of smoking cessation? , 1996, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[4]  N. Owen,et al.  The effectiveness of personalized smoking cessation strategies for callers to a Quitline service. , 2003, Addiction.

[5]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  W. Velicer,et al.  Interactive versus noninteractive interventions and dose-response relationships for stage-matched smoking cessation programs in a managed care setting. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[8]  Diane C. Thompson,et al.  The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[9]  W F Velicer,et al.  Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. Hollis,et al.  Biochemical validation of smoking status: pros, cons, and data from four low-intensity intervention trials. , 1993, Addictive behaviors.

[11]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Subtypes of precontemplating smokers defined by different long-term plans to change their smoking behavior. , 2000, Health education research.

[12]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.