Optimization of Noise Equivalent Count Rate Performance for a Partially Collimated PET Scanner by Varying the Number of Septa

We present a simulation study of the global count-rate performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner with different levels of partial collimation to maximize the noise equivalent count rate for whole-body PET imaging. We achieve partial collimation by removing different numbers of septal rings from the standard 2-D septa set for the GE Advance PET scanner. System behavior is studied with a photon tracking simulation package, which we modify to enable the production of random coincidences. The simulations are validated with measured data taken in 2-D and fully 3-D acquisition mode on a GE Advance system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-2 count-rate phantom with two sets of annular sleeves to expand the diameter to 27 and 35 cm. For all diameters and in 2-D and fully 3-D mode, there is good agreement between measurements and simulations. All studies use the three phantom diameters to evaluate the effect of patient thickness for each amount of collimation. Optimized system parameters, such as maximum ring difference for single slice rebinning, are determined for the five partially collimated systems considered. The resulting global count rates for true, scattered, and random coincidences, the noise equivalent count (NEC) rates, and the scatter fractions for different levels of collimation are compared along with the results from the conventional 2-D and fully 3-D modes. Improved statistical data quality relative to both 2-D and fully 3-D data is found with the partially collimated systems, particularly when one-half or two-thirds of the septal rings are removed. An increase in NEC rates of as much as 50% is found for clinically relevant activities between 5-10 mCi (184-370 MBq). Scatter fractions for the partially collimated systems are intermediate between the 2-D and fully 3-D numbers. Many factors that affect image quality have not been considered in this paper. However, the significant increase in statistical data quality warrants further investigation of the impact of partial collimation on clinical whole-body PET imaging.

[1]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  The effect of collimation on scatter fraction in multi-slice PET , 1988 .

[2]  J. Votaw,et al.  Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. S. Kaplan,et al.  Investigation of the performance of the General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph in 3D mode , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[4]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[5]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A quantitative approach to a weight-based scanning protocol for PET oncology imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[8]  Eiichi Tanaka,et al.  A Monte-Carlo simulation study on coarse septa for scatter correction in 3D PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[9]  Hossain Baghaei,et al.  Septa design study for volumetric imaging in positron emission tomography , 2001 .

[10]  R D Badawi,et al.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[13]  D. Kadrmas,et al.  Survey of parallel slat collimator designs for hybrid PET imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Tomoyuki Hasegawa,et al.  A Monte Carlo simulation study on coarse septa for scatter correction in 3-D PET , 2001 .

[16]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  David Eidelberg,et al.  Quantitative Brain PET. Comparison of 2D and 3D Acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner. , 1998, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[18]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners. , 2005, Medical physics.

[19]  K. Ote,et al.  A high-throughput whole-body PET scanner using flat panel PS-PMTs , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Richard L. Wahl,et al.  Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Harrison,et al.  Slat collimator design issues for dual head coincidence imaging systems , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[22]  H. Baghaei,et al.  Brain lesion detectability studies with a high resolution PET operating in no-septa and partial-septa configurations , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  R. Badawi,et al.  A simulation-based assessment of the revised NEMA NU-2 70 cm long test phantom for PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).