Study on hypercompact and lightweight data logger separators for wild animals

In ecology and ethology, a technique called ‘bio-logging’ has been used to record the behaviour of wild animals by attaching a small logger, which includes a global positioning system (GPS) or acceleration sensor, to the animal of interest. This method's disadvantage is that the recovery of the logger is inefficient. In this study, we propose a data logger separator, which solves this problem by focussing on the logger recovery method. The device, which weighs ∼10 g, is intended for use on a shallow-diving seabird such as gulls. It comprises a separation mechanism based on a rotary key to achieve quiet separation and avoid causing stress to the seabird and the surrounding individuals. Moreover, the device is equipped with a wireless microcomputer that can be separated via a remote control from a distance of ∼100 m. For separation experiments on stuffed birds, the separation performance was confirmed to be sufficient. Because of experimentally testing the device in a real environment with low temperatures and wet conditions, it was considered that the separator's performance was sufficient to allow it to be used practically in the wild. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

[1]  Adrian C. Gleiss,et al.  A new prospect for tagging large free-swimming sharks with motion-sensitive data-loggers , 2009 .

[2]  Kim Holland,et al.  Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Hirokazu Suzuki,et al.  Does Aging Change Foraging Behavior of Black-Tailed Gulls? , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[4]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Foraging tactics of Baikal seals differ between day and night , 2004 .

[5]  Christian Rutz,et al.  New frontiers in biologging science , 2009, Biology Letters.

[6]  Rob Appleby,et al.  OpenDropOff: An open‐source, low‐cost drop‐off unit for animal‐borne devices , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[7]  Koji Yamazaki,et al.  Effect of Mast Production on Home Range use of Japanese Black Bears , 2011 .

[8]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Bio-logging , 2016, Current Biology.

[9]  Jeffrey D. Brawn,et al.  Meta‐analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology , 2010 .

[10]  Yoshiki Morimitsu,et al.  Bio-logging: Animal-borne Video Systems and Drones to Study Behaviors of Mammals and Primates , 2018 .

[11]  Barbara A. Block,et al.  Tracking sharks without teeth: a non-invasive rigid tag attachment for large predatory sharks , 2015, Animal Biotelemetry.

[12]  Ken Yoda,et al.  Bio-logging and navigation of marine animals , 2018 .

[13]  Ken Yoda,et al.  Influence of Local Wind Conditions on the Flight Speed of the Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo , 2012 .

[14]  Shota Tsukamoto,et al.  Male and female Black-tailed Gulls Larus crassirostris feed on the same prey species but use different feeding habitats , 2018, Journal of Ornithology.

[15]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Programmable, miniature video-loggers for deployment on wild birds and other wildlife , 2013 .

[16]  A. Takahashi,et al.  Advances in biologging science: a review of bird studies , 2010 .

[17]  K. Yoda,et al.  Bio-logging and Navigation of Seabirds and Salmonids , 2017 .

[18]  Ken Yoda,et al.  Advances in bio-logging techniques and their application to study navigation in wild seabirds , 2018, Adv. Robotics.