Risk to the supply of ecosystem services across aquatic ecosystems.

The capacity of ecosystems to supply ecosystem services is decreasing. Sustaining this supply requires an understanding of the links between the impacts of pressures introduced by human activities and how this can lead to changes in the supply of services. Here, we apply a novel approach, assessing 'risk to ecosystem service supply' (RESS), across a range of aquatic ecosystems in seven case studies. We link aggregate impact risk from human activities on ecosystem components, with a relative score of their potential to supply services. The greatest RESS is found where an ecosystem component with a high potential to supply services is subject to high impact risk. In this context, we explore variability in RESS across 99 types of aquatic ecosystem component from 11 realms, ranging from oceanic to wetlands. We explore some causes of variability in the RESS observed, including assessment area, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and population density. We found that Lakes, Rivers, Inlets and Coastal realms had some of the highest RESS, though this was highly dependent on location. We found a positive relationship between impact risk and service supply potential, indicating the ecosystem components we rely on most for services, are also those most at risk. However, variability in this relationship indicates that protecting the supply of ecosystem services alone will not protect all parts of the ecosystem at high risk. Broad socio-economic factors explained some of the variability found in RESS. For example, RESS was positively associated with GDP and artificial and agricultural land use in most realms, highlighting the need to achieve balance between increasing GDP and sustaining ecosystem health and human wellbeing more broadly. This approach can be used for sustainable management of ecosystem service use, to highlight the ecosystem components most critical to supplying services, and those most at risk.

[1]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[2]  J. Barbière,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem services supply: Patterns across aquatic ecosystems. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Snejana Moncheva,et al.  An exposure-effect approach for evaluating ecosystem-wide risks from human activities , 2015 .

[4]  Joey R. Bernhardt,et al.  Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning , 2012 .

[5]  Tara Hooper,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of ecosystem services to changing pressures , 2017 .

[6]  Huasheng Hong,et al.  Valuing the effects of hydropower development on watershed ecosystem services: Case studies in the Jiulong River Watershed, Fujian Province, China , 2010 .

[7]  Ana Cristina Cardoso,et al.  Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management , 2016 .

[8]  D. Dudgeon Prospects for sustaining freshwater biodiversity in the 21st century: linking ecosystem structure and function , 2010 .

[9]  Saleem H. Ali,et al.  Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being , 2007 .

[10]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  An ecosystem based framework to link landscape structures, functions and services , 2007 .

[11]  S. Balbi,et al.  Participatory coastal management through elicitation of ecosystem service preferences and modelling driven by "coastal squeeze". , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  J. Wiens Habitat fragmentation: island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation , 2008 .

[13]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[14]  G. Mace,et al.  REVIEW: Towards a risk register for natural capital , 2015, The Journal of applied ecology.

[15]  A. Lillebø,et al.  Assessment of marine ecosystem services indicators: Experiences and lessons learned from 14 European case studies , 2016, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[16]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem services supporting humans: Pivoting from water crisis to water solutions , 2015 .

[17]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[18]  G. Piet,et al.  Ecological risk assessments to guide decision-making: Methodology matters , 2017 .

[19]  H. Levrel,et al.  Marine habitats ecosystem service potential: A vulnerability approach in the Normand-Breton (Saint Malo) Gulf, France , 2015 .

[20]  S. Jordan,et al.  Ecosystem Services of Coastal Habitats and Fisheries: Multiscale Ecological and Economic Models in Support of Ecosystem-Based Management , 2012 .

[21]  A. Boulton,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation strategies for freshwater and marine habitats: a review , 2016 .

[22]  M. Ruckelshaus,et al.  Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Frid,et al.  Linking marine ecosystems with the services they supply: what are the relevant service providing units? , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[25]  A. Green,et al.  Adapting to climate change: assessing the vulnerability of ecosystem services in Europe in the context of rural development , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[26]  G. Piet,et al.  An integrated risk-based assessment of the North Sea to guide ecosystem-based management. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  L. Robinson,et al.  Identifying common pressure pathways from a complex network of human activities to support ecosystem-based management. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  A. Lillebø,et al.  A simple spatial typology for assessment of complex coastal ecosystem services across multiple scales. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  A. Lillebø,et al.  Ecosystem-based management planning across aquatic realms at the Ria de Aveiro Natura 2000 territory. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[31]  M. Kennard,et al.  Integrating multidirectional connectivity requirements in systematic conservation planning for freshwater systems , 2012 .

[32]  L. Robinson,et al.  Identifying barriers, conflict and opportunity in managing aquatic ecosystems. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  P. Reichert,et al.  Ecological assessment of river networks: From reach to catchment scale. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Edward Maltby,et al.  Ecosystem services of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm , 2011 .

[35]  S. Balbi,et al.  Identification of conservation and restoration priority areas in the Danube River based on the multi-functionality of river-floodplain systems. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  M. Elliott,et al.  Putting on a bow-tie to sort out who does what and why in the complex arena of marine policy and management. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  S. Jordan,et al.  Habitat Scale Mapping of Fisheries Ecosystem Service Values in Estuaries , 2010 .

[38]  E. Bennett,et al.  Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery , 2013 .

[39]  Jonathan P. Atkins,et al.  Do marine protected areas deliver flows of ecosystem services to support human welfare , 2014 .

[40]  L. Ballance,et al.  An Ecosystem Services Perspective for the Oceanic Eastern Tropical Pacific: Commercial Fisheries, Carbon Storage, Recreational Fishing, and Biodiversity , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[41]  The Real Value of House Prices: What the Cost of Accommodation Can Tell Policymakers , 2012 .

[42]  K. Mumford Prosperity, Sustainability and the Measurement of Wealth , 2016 .

[43]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[44]  J. Barbière,et al.  Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in Green and Blue Infrastructure designs. A case study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) - Morocco. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  Xin Zhou,et al.  Networking Our Way to Better Ecosystem Service Provision. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Jameal F. Samhouri,et al.  Linking land- and sea-based activities to risk in coastal ecosystems , 2012 .

[47]  P. Reichert,et al.  Introducing the H2020 AQUACROSS project: Knowledge, Assessment, and Management for AQUAtic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services aCROSS EU policies. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  J. Fox Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models , 2003 .

[49]  A. Lillebø,et al.  Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[50]  Jonathan P. Atkins,et al.  "And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!" - A unifying framework for marine environmental management. , 2017, Marine pollution bulletin.

[51]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  A. Meiner,et al.  An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .

[53]  M. Ruckelshaus,et al.  Assessing habitat risk from human activities to inform coastal and marine spatial planning: a demonstration in Belize , 2014 .