Perfusion Imaging: A Data Assimilation Approach

Perfusion imaging (PI) is clinically used to assess strokes and brain tumors. Commonly used PI approaches based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) measure the effect of a contrast agent moving through blood vessels and into tissue. Contrast-agent free approaches, for example, based on intravoxel incoherent motion, also exist, but are so far not routinely used clinically. These methods rely on estimating on the arterial input function (AIF) to approximately model tissue perfusion, neglecting spatial dependencies, and reliably estimating the AIF is also non-trivial, leading to difficulties with standardizing perfusion measures. In this work we therefore propose a data-assimilation approach (PIANO) which estimates the velocity and diffusion fields of an advection-diffusion model that best explains the contrast dynamics. PIANO accounts for spatial dependencies and neither requires estimating the AIF nor relies on a particular contrast agent bolus shape. Specifically, we propose a convenient parameterization of the estimation problem, a numerical estimation approach, and extensively evaluate PIANO. We demonstrate that PIANO can successfully resolve velocity and diffusion field ambiguities and results in sensitive measures for the assessment of stroke, comparing favorably to conventional measures of perfusion.

[1]  Levkovich YuI,et al.  Blood flow velocity in capillaries of brain and muscles and its physiological significance. , 1981, Microvascular research.

[2]  Miguel Marín-Padilla,et al.  The human brain intracerebral microvascular system: development and structure , 2012, Front. Neuroanat..

[3]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Sinc-Approximating Kernels for Medical Image Interpolation , 1999, MICCAI.

[4]  L. Brass,et al.  Middle cerebral artery blood velocity and cerebral blood flow in sickle cell disease. , 1991, Stroke.

[5]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  Anisotropic diffusion in image processing , 1996 .

[6]  Soren Christensen,et al.  Review of Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Time to Tissue. , 2020, Stroke.

[7]  Søren Christensen,et al.  Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Indicator dilution models for the quantification of microvascular blood flow with bolus administration of ultrasound contrast agents , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Deconvolution-Based CT and MR Brain Perfusion Measurement: Theoretical Model Revisited and Practical Implementation Details , 2011, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[10]  Michael Kistler,et al.  The Virtual Skeleton Database: An Open Access Repository for Biomedical Research and Collaboration , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  M. Niethammer,et al.  On Diffusion Tensor Estimation , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  et al.,et al.  ISLES 2015 ‐ A public evaluation benchmark for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation from multispectral MRI , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Cristian Barbarosie,et al.  REPRESENTATION OF DIVERGENCE-FREE VECTOR FIELDS , 2011 .

[14]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  M. Essig,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  J. Boxerman,et al.  Quantitative Delta T1 (dT1) as a Replacement for Adjudicated Central Reader Analysis of Contrast-Enhancing Tumor Burden: A Subanalysis of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6677/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0625 Multicenter Brain Tumor Trial , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Boxerman,et al.  Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low–Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  P. R. Luijten,et al.  Assessment of blood flow velocity and pulsatility in cerebral perforating arteries with 7‐T quantitative flow MRI , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  V. Harabis,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of indicator dilution models for bolus of ultrasound contrast agents , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[21]  T. Hughes,et al.  Stabilized finite element methods. I: Application to the advective-diffusive model , 1992 .

[22]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  An Efficient Parallel Particle Tracker for Advection-Diffusion Simulations in Heterogeneous Porous Media , 2007, Euro-Par.

[23]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Restoration of DWI Data Using a Rician LMMSE Estimator , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Ivanov Kp,et al.  Blood flow velocity in capillaries of brain and muscles and its physiological significance , 1981 .

[25]  Jack Lee,et al.  A spatially-distributed computational model to quantify behaviour of contrast agents in MR perfusion imaging , 2014, Medical Image Anal..