Sensitivity of biological neuron models to fluctuations in synaptic input timing

There are several reasons why it is likely that biological neurons may encode information in spike timing patterns rather than simply spike rate. These reasons are based on both information-theoretic and experimental grounds. In order for a biological neuron to function usefully as a reliable spatio-temporal pattern decoder and encoder, its input/output function must straddle two opposing properties: (1) exhibit generalization to a low level of temporal "jitter" in incoming synaptic spike timings that is below a certain threshold, and (2) have significant differences in response to incoming synaptic patterns that differ over this threshold. We show that several single-neuron models of varying levels of complexity all have this threshold property, and that its range varies between 5-30 milliseconds for each model and experiment examined in this study. This time period can be considered compatible with a clocking scheme for neural activity, and is in functional agreement with the observation that a majority of mammalian brain circuits exhibit synchronous oscillations in or near this frequency range.

[1]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[2]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: the neo-sherringtonian view , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[3]  William R. Softky,et al.  The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[6]  R. Stein,et al.  The information capacity of nerve cells using a frequency code. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[7]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiple channels and calcium dynamics , 1989 .

[8]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Active propagation of somatic action potentials into neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites , 1994, Nature.

[9]  William R. Softky,et al.  Simple codes versus efficient codes , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Traub,et al.  A model of a CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neuron incorporating voltage-clamp data on intrinsic conductances. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  William R. Softky,et al.  Sub-millisecond coincidence detection in active dendritic trees , 1994, Neuroscience.