Variability, fibre waviness and misalignment in the determination of the properties of composite materials and structures

This paper will examine how the choices made in the design of components can influence the properties of composite materials. It will seek to demonstrate that features of the micro and meso-structure which are directly attributable to design decisions must be rigorously identified; and the influence of those features on composite properties must be explicitly included in determining allowable properties. We can then recategorise what we currently experience as defects into design induced defects, which might more properly be regarded as features, and process induced defects which are truly defect states that we can influence by correct choice of manufacturing conditions. Critically, it is necessary that true defect states and variability must be clearly distinguished from inherent or designed-in features as the latter cannot be eliminated by improvements in manufacturing processes. Design defects can only be avoided at the design stage.

[1]  K. Potter.  Deformation properties of uncured reinforcements - a reappraisal , 2004 .

[2]  Kevin D Potter,et al.  Sources of variability in uncured aerospace grade unidirectional carbon fibre epoxy preimpregnate , 2007 .

[3]  In-plane and out-of-plane deformation properties of unidirectional preimpregnated reinforcement , 2002 .

[4]  Kevin D Potter,et al.  The use of kinematic drape modelling to inform the hand lay-up of complex composite components using woven reinforcements , 2006 .

[5]  Effects of Fibre Architecture on Deformation during Preform Manufacture , 1999 .

[6]  Ignace Verpoest,et al.  Full-field strain measurements in textile deformability studies , 2008 .

[7]  Wisnom,et al.  Delamination in Composites with Terminating Internal Plies Under Tension Fatigue Loading , 1995 .

[8]  Anthony J. Vizzini,et al.  Effect of ply-drop configuration on delamination strength of tapered composite structures , 1996 .

[9]  Anoush Poursartip,et al.  Tool–part interaction in composites processing. Part I: experimental investigation and analytical model , 2004 .

[10]  Anoush Poursartip,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of the effect of cure cycle, tool surface, geometry, and lay-up on the dimensional fidelity of autoclave-processed composite parts , 2002 .

[11]  Fabric draping simulation in composites manufacturing. Part I: Description and applications , 1997 .

[12]  Nuri Ersoy,et al.  An experimental method to study the frictional processes during composites manufacturing , 2005 .

[13]  K. Potter,et al.  Simulation of process induced defects in resin transfer moulded woven carbon fibre laminates and their effect on mechanical behaviour , 2006 .

[14]  Influence of the detailed structure of two variants of non-crimped carbon fabric on the drape properties , 2002 .

[15]  Kd Potter,et al.  Implementation and applications of virtual fabric placement in forming fabric reinforcement for production of complex shaped components , 2006 .

[16]  Andrew C. Long,et al.  Influence of stochastic fibre angle variations on the permeability of bi-directional textile fabrics , 2006 .

[17]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Effect of dropped plies on the strength of graphite-epoxy laminates , 1987 .

[18]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  The generation of geometrical deformations due to tool/part interaction in the manufacture of composite components , 2005 .

[19]  Kevin D Potter,et al.  Bias extension measurements on cross-plied unidirectional prepreg , 2002 .

[20]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Suppression of Delamination at Ply Drops in Tapered Composites by Ply Chamfering , 2006 .

[21]  P. Boisse,et al.  A woven reinforcement forming simulation method. Influence of the shear stiffness , 2006 .

[22]  J Hart-Smith.  Designing with Advanced Fibrous Composites , 1988 .