Reusing concrete panels from buildings for building: Potential in Finnish 1970s mass housing

Abstract A remarkable share of European mass housing was built with large-panel systems during the 1960s and 1970s. In many countries, this stock is already being demolished or demolition is discussed due to vacancies or social problems. This trend may result in the creation of an unforeseeable amount of concrete waste. Simultaneously, EU has issued the Waste Framework Directive aiming at reuse instead of recycling. Unlike in situ cast concrete, reclaimed prefabricated concrete panels from mass housing carry the potential for reuse. The purpose of this study is to review the reuse potential embedded in Finland’s mass housing stock from the perspective of the dimensions of the panels and spaces, i.e. , their suitability for architectural (plan) design. The research material consists of architectural drawings of 276 blocks of flats that contain over 26 000 prefabricated wall panels and nearly 14 000 hollow-core slabs, the dimensions of which are compared to current norms and guidelines for dimensioning living spaces. The technical prerequisites for reuse are reviewed with the help of literature. The study results in identifying an inventory of panels typical to Finnish precast concrete construction, which, in principle, should not exist because the building plans were not standardized but were supposed to be unique. The panels are found to be still usable in architectural (plan) design of detached houses, which form one third of annual residential production in Finland.

[1]  A. Glias The "Donor Skelet": Designing with reused structural concrete elements , 2013 .

[2]  Cecília Gravina da Rocha,et al.  A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors , 2009 .

[3]  Mark Gorgolewski,et al.  Designing Buildings Using Reclaimed Steel Components , 2008 .

[4]  André Thomsen,et al.  Understanding obsolescence: a conceptual model for buildings , 2011 .

[5]  N. R. Naber Reuse of hollow core slabs from office buildings to residential buildings , 2012 .

[6]  Clemens Deilmann,et al.  Housing stock shrinkage: vacancy and demolition trends in Germany , 2009 .

[7]  Jukka Lahdensivu,et al.  Durability Properties and Actual Deterioration of Finnish Concrete Facades and Balconies , 2012 .

[8]  Tapio Kaasalainen,et al.  Homogenous homes of Finland: ‘standard’ flats in non-standardized blocks , 2016 .

[9]  Michael Hiete,et al.  Matching construction and demolition waste supply to recycling demand: a regional management chain model , 2011 .

[10]  Mark Gorgolewski,et al.  Designing with reused building components: some challenges , 2008 .

[11]  Jukka Lahdensivu,et al.  Durability demands related to frost attack for Finnish concrete buildings in changing climate , 2014 .

[12]  Hanna M. Mäkelä,et al.  Corrosion of Reinforcement in Existing Concrete Façades , 2013 .

[13]  Bill Addis,et al.  Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling , 2006 .

[14]  A. Mels,et al.  Harvesting urban resources towards more resilient cities , 2012 .

[15]  J. Prins Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[16]  R. van Kempen,et al.  High-Rise Housing In Europe: Current Trends and Future Prospects , 2004 .

[17]  Jukka Lahdensivu,et al.  Statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings , 2016 .

[18]  C. Calderini,et al.  Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa , 2014 .