Individual nanobubbles detection using acoustic based flow cytometry

We use a novel acoustic-based flow cytometer to detect individual nanobubbles flowing in a microfluidic channel using high-frequency ultrasound and photoacoustic waves. Each individual nanobubble (or cluster of nanobubbles) flowing through the foci of high-frequency ultrasound (center frequency 375 MHz) and nanosecond laser (532 nm) pulses interacts with both pulses to generate ultrasound backscatter and photoacoustic waves. We use in-house generated nanobubbles, made of lipid shells and octafluoropropane gas core, to detect ultrasound backscatter signals using an acoustic flow cytometer. Nanobubble solutions sorted in size through differential centrifugation are diluted to 1:10,000 v/v in phosphate buffered saline solution to maximize the probability that the detected signals are from individual nanobubbles. Nanobubble populations were sized using resonant mass measurement. Results show that the amplitude of the detected ultrasound backscatter signal is dependent on the nanobubble size. The average amplitude of the ultrasound backscatter signals from at least 950 nanobubbles with an average diameter of 150 nm, 225 nm, and 350 nm was 5.1±2.5 mV, 5.3±2.3 mV, and 6.4±1.8 mV, respectively. Similarly, we detected interleaved ultrasound backscatter and photoacoustic signals from nanobubbles tagged with Sudan Black B dye. The average amplitude of the ultrasound backscatter and photoacoustic signals from these black nanobubbles with an average diameter of 238 nm is 10±11 mV and 54±75 mV, respectively. The presence of the dye on the shell suppressed unique features seen in the ultrasound backscatter from the nanobubbles without dye. At present, there is no robust commercial technique able to analyze the ultrasonic response of individual nanobubbles. The acoustic flow cytometer can potentially be used to analyze physical parameters, such as size and ultrasonic response, of individual nanobubbles.

[1]  L. Du,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic research on ultrasound microbubble/nanobubble contrast agents (Review). , 2015, Molecular medicine reports.

[2]  R. Coyne,et al.  Effect of the surfactant pluronic on the stability of lipid-stabilized perfluorocarbon nanobubbles , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[3]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Stable microfluidic flow focusing using hydrostatics. , 2017, Biomicrofluidics.

[4]  J. Tiihonen,et al.  Amygdala-orbitofrontal structural and functional connectivity in females with anxiety disorders, with and without a history of conduct disorder , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Simultaneous acoustic and photoacoustic microfluidic flow cytometry for label-free analysis , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  Rajiv Chopra,et al.  Characterization of different bubble formulations for blood-brain barrier opening using a focused ultrasound system with acoustic feedback control , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Li Zhang,et al.  The Optimized Fabrication of Nanobubbles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Tumor Imaging , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Zhanwen Xing,et al.  The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[10]  Pan Li,et al.  Nanobubble-Affibody: Novel ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular ultrasound imaging of tumor. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[11]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Sink or float? Characterization of shell-stabilized bulk nanobubbles using a resonant mass measurement technique† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details, supporting information. See DOI: 10.1039/c8nr08763f , 2018, Nanoscale.

[13]  Shruti Kashinath,et al.  Plasmonic nanobubble-enhanced endosomal escape processes for selective and guided intracellular delivery of chemotherapy to drug-resistant cancer cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[14]  Haoyan Zhou,et al.  Ultrasound imaging beyond the vasculature with new generation contrast agents. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[15]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Special issue on microbubbles: from contrast enhancement to cancer therapy , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  Eric M. Strohm,et al.  Simultaneous ultrasound and photoacoustics based flow cytometry , 2018, BiOS.

[17]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of microbubbles , 2001 .

[18]  F. Kiessling,et al.  Physicochemical Characterization of the Shell Composition of PBCA-Based Polymeric Microbubbles. , 2017, Macromolecular bioscience.

[19]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Hideaki Kobayashi,et al.  Measurement and identification of ultrafine bubbles by resonant mass measurement method , 2014, Other Conferences.

[21]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Formulation and acoustic studies of a new phase-shift agent for diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Luis Solorio,et al.  Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  Phoebe L Stewart,et al.  Cryo-EM Visualization of Lipid and Polymer-Stabilized Perfluorocarbon Gas Nanobubbles - A Step Towards Nanobubble Mediated Drug Delivery , 2017, Scientific Reports.