Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on Student's Learning Outcomes: An empirical study

This article explores the application of different educational taxonomies in measuring students' cognitive learning outcomes. The objectives were to compare three educational taxonomies--namely, the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy, Bloom's taxonomy and reflective thinking measurement model--and to test the application value of these taxonomies. A comparative literature review was conducted to provide an underlying conceptual framework. Recommendations from this review were examined experimentally. Scripts of long essay papers and short classroom discussion responses were analyzed by the modified versions of the taxonomies. It was found that SOLO is suitable for measuring different kinds of learning outcomes. However, finer categorization of SOLO levels did not eradicate the problem of SOLO's conceptual ambiguity. It is suggested that the next step of research should be on setting up panels of judges to find out which taxonomy is suitable for measuring what learning outcomes under which contexts.

[1]  G. Boulton‐Lewis,et al.  Teachers as adult learners: their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching , 1996 .

[2]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[3]  David Kember,et al.  Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow , 1999 .

[4]  John Biggs,et al.  Towards a Model of School-based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy , 1989 .

[5]  Helen Chick,et al.  Cognition in the formal modes: Research mathematics and the SOLO taxonomy , 1998 .

[6]  David W. Smith,et al.  From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essays , 1998 .

[7]  Paul C. Burnett.  Assessing the structure of learning outcomes from counselling using the SOLO taxonomy: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[8]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[9]  David Lake.  Helping students to go SOLO: teaching critical numeracy in the biological sciences , 1999 .

[10]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[11]  Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis,et al.  The SOLO Taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education , 1995 .

[12]  Jinoos Hosseini.  Application of Bloom's Taxonomy and Piaget Model of Cognitive Processes to Teaching of Management Information Systems Concepts , 1993, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[13]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .