Recruitment Procedures of EPIC-Germany

EPIC is among the largest cohort studies, with approximately 475,000 study participants, on the etiological influence of diet and chronic diseases. During a 4-year recruitment period, two German EPIC centers, located in Heidelberg and Potsdam, aimed to recruit a total of 60,000 study participants from the local populations. The recruitment process was based on addresses from general population registries and started 4–5 weeks in advance with an initial invitation by mail to the basic examination for this study. Subjects not responding within 2 weeks were reminded. In Potsdam, this was done by mail and telephone, and in Heidelberg by telephone. During the recruitment phase, from 1994 to 1998, 53,162 subjects in total were examined for the cohort studies in Heidelberg (n = 25,546) and Potsdam (n = 27,616). The participation rate, compared to the invited number of subjects, was 22.7% in Potsdam and 38.3% in Heidelberg, with a considerable variation by municipality and gender. A comparison with data from the National Health Survey 1991/1992 revealed that the cohort populations were of higher socio-economic status and were healthier than the source population. We concluded that the selective participation would help to ensure high maintenance of the cohort during active follow-up. Selective participation does not harm etiological conclusions because disease associations are derived internally as relative risk. The relative risk estimates can be used to calculate population-attributable risk and preventable proportion, based on exposure prevalence derived by surveys and other studies.

[1]  A. Miller,et al.  A cohort study of fat intake and risk of breast cancer. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  Cancer Prevention Study II. The American Cancer Society Prospective Study. , 1992, Statistical bulletin.

[3]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  Non-participants in a general population study of men, with special reference to social and alcoholic problems. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[4]  Birgit R. Brandstetter,et al.  Dietary Habits in the German EPIC Cohorts: Food Group Intake Estimated with the Food Frequency Questionnaire , 1999, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[5]  D. Cook,et al.  Non-participation and mortality in a prospective study of cardiovascular disease. , 1987, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  R A Goldbohm,et al.  A large-scale prospective cohort study on diet and cancer in The Netherlands. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  H. Boeing,et al.  EPIC-Germany – A Source for Studies into Diet and Risk of Chronic Diseases , 1999, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[8]  M. Criqui Response bias and risk ratios in epidemiologic studies. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  H. Boeing,et al.  Follow-Up Procedures in EPIC-Germany – Data Quality Aspects , 1999, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[10]  M. Thun,et al.  Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  E. Shahar,et al.  The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  W. Willett,et al.  Approaches for conducting large cohort studies. , 1998, Epidemiologic reviews.

[13]  H. Boeing,et al.  Measures of Quality Control in the German Component of the EPIC Study , 1999, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[14]  U. Keil,et al.  Five-year changes in population blood pressure and hypertension prevalence. Results from the MONICA Augsburg surveys 1984/85 and 1989/90. , 1993, Annals of epidemiology.

[15]  Elio Riboli,et al.  The EPIC Project: Rationale and study design , 1997 .

[16]  Gert B. M. Mensink,et al.  National trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Germany. , 1994, Preventive medicine.