Gradation of Neck Muscle Responses and Head/Neck Kinematics to Acceleration and Speed Change in Rear-end Collisions.

Recent epidemiological evidence shows that the potential for whiplash injury varies with both the average acceleration and speed change of a rear-end collision. The goal of this study was to examine the gradation of neck muscle responses and the head and neck kinematics to rear-end collision pulses in which the acceleration and speed change were independently varied. Thirty subjects (15F, 15M) underwent 36 consecutive rear-end collisions consisting of three different average accelerations (ā = 0.5, 0.9 and 1.3 g) and three different speed changes (Deltav = 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s). Onset and amplitude of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and cervical paraspinal (PARA) muscle responses were measured using surface electromyography. Kinematic measures included linear and angular accelerations and displacements of the head and torso. The results showed that the amplitude of the muscle and kinematics responses was graded to both collision acceleration and speed change. The magnitude of early peaks in the head/neck kinematics correlated more strongly with collision acceleration (r(2) = 0.63 to 0.69), whereas the magnitude of later kinematic peaks correlated more strongly with collision speed change (r(2) = 0.59 to 0.95). Onset of the SCM muscle response correlated only weakly with collision acceleration and speed change (r(2) </= 0.07). A collision pulse descriptor obtained by multiplying average acceleration and speed change (āDeltav) yielded the strongest and most consistent correlations with neck muscle (r(2) = 0.48 to 0.58) and head/neck kinematic responses (r(2) = 0.78 to 0.94). This measure of collision severity is also consistent with the recent epidemiological evidence that whiplash symptom intensity and duration increases with both average acceleration and speed change.

[1]  Judson B. Welcher,et al.  Human Occupant Motion in Rear-End Impacts: Effects of Incremental Increases in Velocity Change , 2001 .

[2]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  REAR-END COLLISIONS - THE EFFECT OF THE SEAT-BELT AND THE CRASH PULSE ON OCCUPANT MOTION , 1995 .

[3]  B A Winkelstein,et al.  An anatomical investigation of the human cervical facet capsule, quantifying muscle insertion area , 2001, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  Terry D. Blumenthal,et al.  Inhibition of the human startle response is affected by both prepulse intensity and eliciting stimulus intensity , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[5]  Terry A. Smith,et al.  Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions , 1997 .

[6]  J. Allum,et al.  Head-Trunk Coordination in Man: Is Trunk Angular Velocity Elicited by a Support Surface Movement the Only Factor Influencing Head Stabilization? , 1992 .

[7]  Pete Thomas,et al.  A study of soft tissue neck injuries in the UK , 1996 .

[8]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Attenuation of human neck muscle activity following repeated imposed trunk-forward linear acceleration , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  R Fredriksson,et al.  Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC). , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[12]  G. M. Mackay,et al.  REAR END COLLISIONS AND SEAT PERFORMANCE - TO YIELD OR NOT TO YIELD , 1995 .

[13]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  IMPAIRMENT PATTERN IN PASSENGER CAR CRASHES, A FOLLOW-UP OF INJURIES RESULTING IN LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES , 1995 .

[14]  J. B. Wheeler,et al.  Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Alyssa L DeMarco,et al.  The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Ola Boström,et al.  ASSESSING THE INFLUENCE OF CRASH PULSE, SEAT FORCE CHARACTERISTICS, AND HEAD RESTRAINT POSITION ON NIC max IN REAR-END CRASHES USING A MATHEMATICAL BioRID DUMMY , 1999 .

[17]  R Fredriksson,et al.  How crash severity in rear impacts influences short- and long-term consequences to the neck. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  William J.T. Daniel,et al.  Influence of deceleration profiles on occupant velocity differential and injury potential , 2001 .

[19]  J Quintern,et al.  Stumbling reactions in man: significance of proprioceptive and pre‐programmed mechanisms. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Temming,et al.  Frequency and risk of cervical spine distortion injuries in passenger car accidents: significance of human factors data , 1998 .

[21]  Maria Krafft,et al.  When Do AIS 1 Neck Injuries Result in Long-Term Consequences? Vehicle and Human Factors , 2002 .

[22]  David J. Sanderson,et al.  Awareness Affects the Response of Human Subjects Exposed to a Single Whiplash-Like Perturbation , 2003, Spine.

[23]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.